Indian Journal of Palliative Care
Open access journal 
  Print this page Email this page   Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Users online: 154  
     Home | About | Feedback | Login 
  Current Issue Back Issues Editorial Board Authors and Reviewers How to Subscribe Advertise with us Contact Us Analgesic Prescription  
  Navigate Here 
 Search
 
  
 Resource Links
  »  Similar in PUBMED
 »  Search Pubmed for
 »  Search in Google Scholar for
 »Related articles
  »  Article in PDF (849 KB)
  »  Citation Manager
  »  Access Statistics
  »  Reader Comments
  »  Email Alert *
  »  Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this Article
 »  Abstract
 » Introduction
 » Methods
 » Results
 » Discussion
 » Conclusions
 »  References
 »  Article Figures
 »  Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed186    
    Printed0    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded5    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

 


 
Table of Contents 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 26  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 421-427

Experiences of living with intestinal ostomy: A qualitative meta-synthesis


1 Faculty, College of Nursing, AIIMS, New Delhi, India
2 Principal, Chitkara School of Health Sciences, Chitkara University, Rajpura, Punjab, India

Date of Submission30-Jan-2020
Date of Acceptance26-Mar-2020
Date of Web Publication19-Nov-2020

Correspondence Address:
Mamta Choudhary
College of Nursing, AIIMS, New Delhi
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/IJPC.IJPC_21_20

Rights and Permissions

 » Abstract 


Aims and Objectives: The aim and objective of the study was to identify, compare, and synthesize published qualitative evidence to have in-depth understanding of experiences of patients living with intestinal ostomy. Background: Over the past two decades, there have been numerous qualitative studies published depicting intense experiences of stoma patients brought about by the need to adapt with changing conditions following stoma creation. Synthesizing the findings of these studies can improve the understanding among health-care providers of needed support and care for ostomates. Design: This was a qualitative meta-synthesis. Methods: Published articles were identified from the Medline, CINAHL, SciELO, PsycINFO, PubMed, WOS, Google Scholar and a hand search through selected journals published since 2000, and from references lists. Thirteen articles were selected using the predefined criteria. Results: A total of 222 patients, aged between 14 and 83 years from 13 studies, were identified for data collection. Ninety-seven were male and the rest of them were female. The themes identified were physical problems, psychological issues, social relations, environmental impact, and coping and adaptation to stoma. Conclusions: The findings of the study identified numerous challenges and limitations in the life of patients with stoma. However, improving their skills of using problem-solving coping strategies and their interactions with other ostomates can help them to live a better and well-adjusted life.


Keywords: Challenges with stoma, intestinal stoma, living experiences, quality of life


How to cite this article:
Choudhary M, Kaur H. Experiences of living with intestinal ostomy: A qualitative meta-synthesis. Indian J Palliat Care 2020;26:421-7

How to cite this URL:
Choudhary M, Kaur H. Experiences of living with intestinal ostomy: A qualitative meta-synthesis. Indian J Palliat Care [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 Dec 3];26:421-7. Available from: https://www.jpalliativecare.com/text.asp?2020/26/4/421/300794





 » Introduction Top


The word “stoma ”has come from the Greek word which means the mouth or opening. One well-known form of an artificial stoma is an intestinal ostomy, which is a surgically created opening in the large intestine or ileum that allows the removal of feces out of the body to drain into a pouch or other collection device.[1] Intestinal ostomy is a procedure that is implemented to treat several conditions, including acute diverticulitis, rectal cancer, trauma, or inflammatory bowel disease.[1],[2] This therapeutic approach can be temporary or permanent and creates many challenges in terms of quality of life and functioning. Although ostomy is a life-saving surgery, there is immense evidence of maladjustment in ostomates throughout the world.[3]

The presence of a stoma enforces numerous changes and limitations in the life of the patient. These changes start, the moment the disease or condition is discovered, triggering different patient coping behaviors. People with a new ostomy generally pay more attention to the negative aspects of the stoma and its effect on his/her body image. At first, many patients would rather like to die than living with the stoma. Over the days, they start to realize that having an ostomy means gaining the opportunity for a new life. In this sense, it is noticed that, after an ostomy, individuals thus treated experience moments of emotional or psychological change that, by affecting the quality of life, self-esteem, body image, and even their sexuality, can generate anxiety and even depression.[4],[5],[6]

When subjected to this surgery, these people start living a different experience where their standard of living and rhythm of life begin to change. Their desires and values are often not fulfilled nor respected; they feel rejected, seeking seclusion because of the odor and elimination of feces through the abdomen.[7]

In view to complexity of the theme and intense experiences of stoma patients brought about by the need to adapt with changing condition, the meta-synthesis was done to explore the available evidence to have in-depth understanding of phenomenon.

Objective

The objective of the study was to identify, compare, and synthesize published qualitative evidence to have in-depth understanding of experiences of living with intestinal ostomy.


 » Methods Top


A qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis design was employed in the study. The process of meta-synthesis consisted of three steps: (a) identifying the published papers for inclusion and determination of their relevance, (b) quality appraisal of published papers and data extraction, and (c) summarizing and synthesis of findings.

Identifying the published papers for inclusion and determination of their relevance

Published articles were identified from the Medline, CINAHL, SciELO, PsychINFO, PubMed, WOS, Google scholar and a hand search through selected journals published since 2000, and from references lists. The keywords used for search were “Quality of Life, ”Intestinal Stoma, “Living experiences, ”and “challenges with stoma. ”The suitability of the study for inclusion was determined by the following screening questions: (1) Do the report findings of paper involve qualitative methods for data collection and analysis? and (2) Is the focus of paper relevant to the synthesis topic?

Inclusion criteria

  • Qualitative studies with phenomenological, grounded, ethnographic, and descriptive research design
  • Studies with adult patients having intestinal stoma as participants.


Exclusion criteria

  • Studies including patients with significant language impairment, cognitive impairment, other major comorbid medical difficulties, or with a past history of psychiatric problems
  • The studies reporting focus from the perspectives of caregivers of ostomates
  • Studies reporting use of mixed method approach, quantitative approach, or case studies.


Quality appraisal and data extraction

Two main criteria were used in the evaluation and quality appraisal of qualitative research, i.e., credibility and relevance. Studies meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria were subjected to further scrutiny using the following series of seven questions.

Credibility

  • Were sampling strategies and data collection methods explained?
  • Was method of data analysis discussed and enough data provided to allow the reader to determine support of the data to the interpretations (auditability)
  • Did the authors acknowledge the influence of the research process and the presence of researcher including the role of prior biases, assumptions and experience, on the collected data (reflexivity)?
  • Has appropriate attention given to negative cases and to contradictory data?
  • Had the author explored alternative, plausible explanations for the data collected and incorporate a range of different perspectives (fair dealing).


Relevance

  • Was information regarding participants, settings, and context provided (transferability)?
  • Did the author broadly discuss the findings and proposed generalization of findings and/or suggest the scope of future research (analytic generalization)?


Summarizing and synthesis

Condensing labels were used to summarize and list down the perspectives of various studies. Themes identified by researchers were noted and cross-checked against their cited data. After summarization of data in each paper by labels, these were charted under unifying headings. Concepts were developed that synthesized the findings of all the papers included in the meta-synthesis.


 » Results Top


Identifying the published papers for inclusion and determination of their relevance

The search identified 282 papers, of which 13 papers[8],[9],[10],[11],[12],[13],[14],[15],[16],[17],[18],[19],[20] had potential relevance to the review question [Figure 1].
Figure 1: Flow diagram of the selection process of articles of the meta-synthesis according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses

Click here to view


Quality appraisal and data extraction

All 13 included studies satisfied the criteria for quality appraisal and data extraction [Table 1].
Table 1: Studies included in the meta-synthesis

Click here to view


Summarizing and synthesis

A total of 222 patients, aged between 14 and 83 years, from 13 studies were included in the study. Ninety-seven were male and the rest of them were female. Studies from 2000 to 2020 were included in the meta-synthesis.[8],[9],[10],[11],[12],[13],[14],[15],[16],[17],[18],[19],[20] There were 11 phenomenological studies and 2 exploratory ethnographic studies. The method of data collection in the included studies was self-report technique, interviews using semi-structured questionnaire, open-ended questions, focused group interviews, and in-depth interview technique. The themes identified were physical problems, psychological issues, social relations, environmental impact, and coping and adaptation [Table 2].
Table 2: Summary of themes and subthemes identified from the studies

Click here to view


Physical problems

Limitation in physical and recreational activities

Majority of the patients experienced lack of energy leading to a reduction in their usual activities. It affected their person's life style, ability of self-care, and care of family members. Patients also reported limitation in lifting heavy objects due to weakness and site of stoma.[8],[9],[14],[15] Stoma was also perceived as an obstacle in various recreational activities such as visiting to theater or cinema, opting for swimming, or just to have a day outing for shopping, as it is difficult to find public convenience for bag emptying.[9],[10],[11],[12],[16],[18],[20]

Alteration in body image

Stoma, stoma appliance, and abdominal wounds changed perceived appearance of ostomates. Patients reported feeling of shame and horror while having first sight of stoma. They viewed their body image as deeply unattractive and avoided looking at stoma. Temporary or permanent changes in abdominal shape were also reported to be disheartening.[10],[16],[18],[20]

Issues in travelling

Difficulty in cleaning, emptying, or changing the stoma bag during long travels was the main issue hindering ostomates to plan for long journeys. Fear of passing of flatus in public transport further reported to restrict the travel.[8],[10],[14],[15],[16]

Sleep disturbance

Patients explained an increased need for resting as they never feel free while sleeping and often have to be awake in the event of leaking of stoma bag. They had to avoid few sleeping positions as per the site of stoma further adding to sleep disturbances.[8],[9],[12],[14],[16]

Nutritional issues

One major problem reported was a need to change diet to avoid obstruction and lack of proper information about needed dietary changes. Patients reported to have discomfort and problems such as belching, nausea, or gas formation after consuming some of the food items. The need to leave their favorite dishes to manage the stoma functioning was described as distressing.[9],[14],[15],[16]

Alteration in clothing style

Ostomates mentioned impaired self-identity, as they could not dress like before, nicely and fashionably. They were forced to avoid tight fitting clothes as it reveals their stoma bag. Few positions of stoma made it compulsory to wear loose and baggy clothes to cover stoma site so that no one can see it. Furthermore, ostomy placed at the site of waistband added to problem of scraping and irritation, necessitating change in clothing style.[10],[13],[14],[16]

Complications of stoma

Frequent irritation, itching, and rash around the ostomy site were common reported complication by the ostomates. Patients were severely discommoded by the problem of passing flatus and with the fear of passing it in the public.[10],[14],[16],[17],[20]

Psychological issues

Impaired psychological well-being

Patients mentioned to suffer from some degree of cognitive and mental problems following stoma creation. Feeling of uncertainty of future further added to mental distress. Patients reported negative feelings about themselves and stoma creation such as guilt, feeling afraid, feeling alone, shame, getting upset easily, and remarked feeling of inferiority.[8],[10],[12],[19] They often felt lack of confidence; few revealed events of mental break down and receiving psychiatric therapy for major depression.,[10],[11],[12],[13],[15],[19]

Comparison with normal people

The limitations imposed by the stoma enhanced comparison with normal persons in surroundings such as family members and friends adding to feeling of jealousy, feeling of incompleteness, and inferiority, leading to mental distress and social isolation. Dependency on others for self-care further contributed to this comparison.[11],[14],[16]

Social relations

Marital and sexual relationship

Majority of the patients described limited or no sexual intercourse following stoma creation, which added to the fear getting separated or divorced. Although many felt their partner to be supportive and helpful, but still they perceived changes in relationship with their partners.[8],[9],[15],[20] Problems with erection in males and fear of looking unattractive with stoma among females were common factors contributing to the avoidance of sexual activities.[8],[9],[14],[15],[20]

Relationship with family, friends, and others

Some of the patients mentioned that their family and friends accepted the stoma and tried to cooperate; however, others felt that they tried to maintain distance and avoid the ostomates. Patients felt more comfortable and less depressed when they received support of family and friends. Ostomates reported preference to avoid family or social gatherings because of fear of offensive gas emission.[8],[9],[10],[15],[16],[19] Further dilemma of disclosing about stoma and self-imposed limits about disclosures to the gathering restricted their participation. Feeling of getting nervous and upset easily, feeling of inferiority, and shame made public interaction very difficult for the patients, further adding to social isolation.[9],[10],[11],[13],[18],[20]

Environmental impact

Financial burden

Patients reported that they had to either change or leave their job following stoma creation, which affected their income. Various complications of stoma hindered working hours and increased need of sick leaves, further decreasing income. Moreover, disease-related costs, for example, buying bags, gloves, and stoma care kits, enhanced financial burden.[8],[9],[10],[14],[15],[16]

Lack of tailored counseling services

Patients experienced that follow-up counseling services were not tailored to their specific needs related to stoma care and complication management. Lack of regular meetings and failure of coordinator to address personal questions were major concerns of patients.[12],[16],[18]

Coping and adaptation

Use of problem-solving coping strategies

Patients reported to focus on problem-solving strategies to deal with various limitations, to establish relationship with family members and significant others, and to have continuity of daily activity performance. The personal competence of being positive and experimenting with different ways to resolve limitations had a great influence on adaptation process.[8],[9],[13],[15],[16],[17]

Learning in group

Learning in group with and from another person with stoma was mentioned as extreme helpful to enable individual to manage stoma. Patients reported to have improved mood and ability to relax when they got opportunity to interact with other ostomates. Experimenting and planning activities together was mentioned to solve many problems of every day's life with stoma.[12],[16],[18],[20]


 » Discussion Top


The main focus of the meta-synthesis was to assess experiences of living with intestinal ostomy which were categorized in various themes as physical problems, psychological issues, social relations, environmental impact, and coping and adaptation. The findings of the meta-synthesis exhibited the complexity and diversity of experiences of individuals living with intestinal stoma. When it is concerned with physical problems, patients reported limitation in numerous aspects such as limitation in physical and recreational activities, inability to opt for long journeys, sleep disturbance causing increased felt need for rest, inability to consume various food items, imposed need to change the clothing style, and necessity to deal with frequent complication of stoma (Alwi F et al. (2018), Ceylan H, Vural F (2017), Thorpe G et al. (2016), Shaffy et al. (2014), Danielsen A K et al. (2013), Danielsen A K et al. [2012), Dabirian A et al. [2010), Honkala S et al. [2009), Nicholas DB et al. [2008), Annells M [2006), Persson E., Hellstrom AL [2002). The fear of leakage, gas, and obstruction along with a lack of energy imposed various limitation in the life of ostomates.

Stoma was found to have devastating psychological impact on ostomates. Negative feelings about stoma creation and themselves such as guilt, feeling afraid, feeling alone, shame, getting upset easily, and remarked feeling of inferiority impaired psychological well-being of patients (Alwi F et al.(2018), Thorpe G et al.(2016), Danielsen A K et al.(2013), Shaffy et al.(2012), Dabirian A et al.(2010), Honkala S et al.(2009), Annells M (2006).

Limitations caused by stoma imposed social isolation among ostomates. However, the support of family and friends was positively appreciated by patients. Concern about sexual life and relationship stability was more evident and emphasizes counseling needs in this area. (Dabirian A et al.(2010), Shaffy et al.(2012). Financial burden was other added concern because of inability to carry out routine job, need to either leave or change the job, and increased need of sick leaves. Bearing expenses of routine stoma care further adds to this stress. (Alwi F et al.(2018), Dabirian A et al.(2010), Honkala S et al.(2009).

However, most of the patients reported use of problem-solving coping strategies to deal with these limitations, adding to their personal competence of being positive and proactive, strongly influencing their rehabilitation process. (Barnabe NC et al.(2008), Nicholas DB et al.(2008), Annells M (2006). Various interventional studies enlightened innovative methods of such preoperative intensive education combined with traditional postoperative education (Chaudhri et al. 2005, Bryan and Dukes 2010),[21],[22] use of multimedia in patients' teachings (Lo et al. 2011),[23] follow-up using telemedicine or telenursing services (Bohnenkamp et al. 2004)[24] to improve self-care capacities of ostomates. Individual-based folAlow-up counseling session can further enhance the patient's ability to combat imposed challenges by stoma.[25]

Limitation and recommendations

The meta-synthesis focused on the qualitative evidence only. Although qualitative evidence provides better understanding and insight into experiences of patients with stoma, the addition of quantitative evidence can enhance the degree of certainty with the help of quantitative analysis. This study recommends and emphasizes the need for meta-analysis of quantitative evidence to have in-depth knowledge of consequences of having a stoma. Furthermore, the studies included in the meta-synthesis focused on the limitation related to stoma but lacked exploration on techniques to manage those limitations to improve health-related quality of life or to reduce cost. The study recommends an additional research to assess the effect of group learning on coping and adaptation to stoma among ostomates and to explore further techniques to ease the life of ostomates.


 » Conclusions Top


The findings of the study identified a numerous challenges and limitations in life patients with stoma. However, improving their skills of using problem-solving coping strategies and their interactions with other ostomates can help them to live a better and well-adjusted life.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
 » References Top

1.
Tortora JG, Grabowski RS. Digestive System Principles of Anatomy and Physiology. 3rd ed. New Jersey: Elsevier Publication, Von Hoffman Press; 2003. p. 881-95.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Bekkers MJ, Knippenberg FC, Dulmen AM, Borne HW, Henegouwen GP. Survival and psychosocial adjustment to stoma surgery and non-stoma bowel resection: A 4-year follow-up. Psychosomatic Res 1997;42:235-44.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Krouse RS, Grant M, Rawl SM, Mohler MJ, Baldwin CM, Coons SJ, et al. Coping and acceptance: The greatest challenge for veterans with intestinal stomas. J Psychosom Res 2009;66:227-33.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Silva MA, Ratnayake G, Deen KI. Quality of life of stoma patients: Temporary ileostomy versus colostomy. World J Surg 2003;27:421-4.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Scarpa M, Barollo M, Polese L, Keighley MR. Quality of life in patients with an ileostomy. Minerva Chir 2004;59:23-9.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Marquis P, Marrel A, Jambon B. Quality of life in patients with stomas: The Montreux Study. Ostomy Wound Manage 2003;49:48-55.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Roshini AP, Sunny A. Quality of life assessment in stoma patients in a tertiary care ospital in South India: A cross- sectional study. Int Surg J 2017;4:2037-41.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Setiawan AF, Asrizab. Quality of life of person with permanent colostomy: A Phenomenological study. J Coloproctol 2018;8:295-301.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Ceylan H, Vural F. Living with stoma-A phenomenological study. J Nurs Res Pract 2017;1:06-12.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Thorpe G, Arthur A, McArthur M. Adjusting to bodily change following stoma formation: A phenomenological study. Disabil Rehabil 2016;38:1791-802.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Shaffy, Kaur S, Das K, Gupta R. Psychosocial experiences of the patients with colostomy/ileostomy: A qualitative study. Indian J Soc Psychiatry 2014;30:28-34.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Danielsen AK, Soerensen EE, Burcharth K, Rosenberg J. Impact of a temporary stoma on patients' everyday lives: Feeling of uncertainty while waiting for closure of the stoma. J Clin Nurs 2013;22:1343-52.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Danielsen AK, Soerensen EE, Burcharth K, Rosenberg J. Learning to live with a permanent intestinal ostomy: Impact on everyday life and educational needs. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2013;40:407-12.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Shaffy, Kaur S, Das K, Gupta R. Physical, nutritional and sexual problems experienced by the patients with colostomy/ileostomy: A qualitative study. Nurs Midwifery Res J 2012;8:210-22.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Dabirian A, Yaghmaei F, Rassouli M, Tafreshi MZ. Quality of life in ostomy patients: A qualitative study. Patient Prefer Adherence 2010;5:1-5.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Honkala S, Bertero C. Living with an ostomy: Women's long tern experiences. Vard I Norden 2009;92:19-22.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Barnabe NC. Dell'Acqua MCQ. Coping strategies of ostomized individuals. Rev Latino-Am de Enfermagem 2008;16:712-9.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Nicholas DB. Swan SR, Gerstle TJ, Allan T, Griffith AM. Struggles, strengths, and strategies: An ethnographic study exploring the experiences of adolescents living with an ostomy. Health Quality Life Outcomes 2018;6:114.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Annells M. The experience of flatus incontinence from a bowel ostomy: A hermeneutic phenomenology. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2006;33:518-24.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Persson E, Hellström AL. Experiences of Swedish men and women 6 to 12 weeks after ostomy surgery. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2002;29:103-8.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Chaudhri S, Brown L, Hassan I, Horgan AF. Preoperative intensive, community-based vs. traditional stoma education: A randomized, controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2005;48:504-9.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Bryan S, Dukes S. The enhanced recovery programme for stoma patients: An audit. Br J Nurs 2010;19:831-4.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Lo SF, Wang YT, Wu LY, Hsu MY, Chang SC, Hayter M. Multimedia education programme for patients with a stoma: Effectiveness evaluation. J Adv Nurs 2011;67:68-76.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Bohnenkamp SK, McDonald P, Lopez AM, Krupinski E, Blackett A. Traditional versus telenursing outpatient management of patients with cancer with new ostomies. Oncol Nurs Forum 2004;31:1005-10.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Simmons KL, Smith JA, Bobb KA, Liles LL. Adjustment to colostomy: Stoma acceptance, stoma care self-efficacy and interpersonal relationships. J Adv Nurs 2007;60:627-35.  Back to cited text no. 25
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
Online since 1st October '05
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow