Indian Journal of Palliative Care
Open access journal 
  Print this page Email this page   Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Users online: 27  
     Home | About | Feedback | Login 
  Current Issue Back Issues Editorial Board Authors and Reviewers How to Subscribe Advertise with us Contact Us Analgesic Prescription  
  Navigate Here 
 Search
 
  
 Resource Links
  »  Similar in PUBMED
 »  Search Pubmed for
 »  Search in Google Scholar for
 »Related articles
  »  Article in PDF (575 KB)
  »  Citation Manager
  »  Access Statistics
  »  Reader Comments
  »  Email Alert *
  »  Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this Article
 »  Abstract
 » Introduction
 »  Materials and Me...
 » Results
 » Discussion
 » Acknowledgments
 »  References
 »  Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed3457    
    Printed130    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded94    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 2    

Recommend this journal

 


 
Table of Contents 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2012  |  Volume : 18  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 40-44

Should blood cultures be performed in terminally Ill cancer patients?


1 Department of Pulmonology, Kameda Medical Center, Chiba, Japan
2 Department of Laboratory Medicine, Kameda Medical Center, Chiba, Japan

Date of Web Publication18-Jun-2012

Correspondence Address:
Nobuhiro Asai
Department of Pulmonology, Kameda Medical Center, Chiba
Japan
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0973-1075.97348

Rights and Permissions

 » Abstract 

Background: No evidence-based guidelines or protocols to treat the infection-related symptoms in cancer patients with terminal stages have been established.
Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed all the patients with terminal stage cancer who died between April 2009 and March 2010. The patients' background, the prevalence of infection and clinical outcomes, pathogens isolated, antibiotics used, and whether blood cultures and some of examinations were performed or not were evaluated.
Results: A total of 62 (44 males and 18 females) patients were included in this study. The median age was 73 years (35-98 years). The most common cancer was that of the lung (n =59, 95.2%). A total of 32 patients were diagnosed with the following infections: Infection of respiratory tract in 27 (84.4%), of urinary tract in 4 (12.5%), and cholangitis in 1 (3.1%). Two cases (6.3%) had pneumonia complicated with urinary tract infection. Blood cultures and antibiotic therapies were performed in 28 and 30 cases, respectively. Four (14.3%) positive cultures were isolated from the blood obtained from 28 individual patients. As for clinical course, 3 (10%) of them experienced improved symptoms after antibiotic therapy. Twenty-seven (90%) patients were not confirmed as having any symptom improvement.
Conclusions: Blood cultures and antibiotic therapy were limited, and might not be effective in terminally ill cancer patients with lung cancer. We suggest that administering an antibiotic therapy without performing a blood culture would be one of choices in those with respiratory tract infections if patients' life expectancy is short.


Keywords: Blood culture, Respiratory tract infection, Terminally ill cancer


How to cite this article:
Asai N, Aoshima M, Ohkuni Y, Otsuka Y, Kaneko N. Should blood cultures be performed in terminally Ill cancer patients?. Indian J Palliat Care 2012;18:40-4

How to cite this URL:
Asai N, Aoshima M, Ohkuni Y, Otsuka Y, Kaneko N. Should blood cultures be performed in terminally Ill cancer patients?. Indian J Palliat Care [serial online] 2012 [cited 2020 Nov 30];18:40-4. Available from: https://www.jpalliativecare.com/text.asp?2012/18/1/40/97348



 » Introduction Top


Terminally ill cancer patients experience a high incidence of a variety of infections. [1],[2] It is thought that the majority of these patients eventually die due to infection. [3],[4] Actually, every physician experiences treating infections in terminal stage cancer patients. However, no evidence-based guidelines or protocols to treat the infection-related symptoms in terminally ill cancer patients have been established. This situation makes physicians frustrated when facing such patients. Needless to say, performing blood culture before starting antibiotic therapy is very important for bacterial detection. [5] However, repeated venous punctures might be stressful for patients as well as the medical staff. Should blood cultures be performed for patients on best supportive care (BSC), with short life expectancy, for infection treatment? Some previously documented that antibiotic therapy was effective for terminally ill cancer patients who were symptomatic and clearly conscious in order to improve symptoms related to infection and their quality of life (QOL). [4],[6],[7],[8],[9] On the other hand, it is reported that antibiotic therapy is less effective among patients with respiratory tract infections than among those with urinary tract infections (UTIs). [7],[8],[9] It is very common that dexamethasone (DEX), palliative sedation, or both are given to terminally ill patients with lung cancer because they mostly present with severe dyspnea. [7],[8],[9],[10],[11],[12] Blood culture in the treatment for infection is a standard practice. [5] Nevertheless, we wish to focus on whether physicians should perform blood culture for and administer antibiotic therapy to patients who are already undergoing palliative sedation and who are unconscious. It has never been demonstrated whether a blood culture is necessary or not in the treatment of infection in these patients as far as we could determine. This retrospective study is the first report describing the therapeutic impact of blood cultures in terminally ill cancer patients. We hope that this report would be a key to establish the guidelines for the treatment of infections in terminally ill patients.


 » Materials and Methods Top


We retrospectively reviewed all the patients with terminal stage cancer who died between April 2009 and March 2010 at the Department of Pulmonology, Kameda Medical Center, Japan. The patients' characteristics, the prevalence of infection, clinical outcomes including survival time and symptoms improved after antibiotic therapy, pathogens isolated, antibiotics used, whether blood cultures and some of examinations were performed or not, and the therapeutic impact of blood culture on the management of infection treatment were evaluated. The survival time was calculated from the day of admission to death. The symptom response was reviewed from the nursing and medical records.

Statistical analysis

Comparisons of group means were made by unpaired or paired t-tests or the Mann-Whitney U-test. Contingency tables were evaluated by Fisher's exact probability test. P-values <0.05 were considered significant.


 » Results Top


A total of 62 (44 males and 18 females) patients were eligible for this study. The median age was 73 years (range 35-98 years). Patient characteristics are shown in [Table 1]. The most common cancer was that of lung (n =59, 95.2%). Thirty-two of the 62 (51.6%) patients experienced an infection. The median survival time and median duration of antibiotic therapy were 22.6 days (SD, ±20.6; range, 1-108 days) and 6.7 days (range, 1-21 days), respectively.
Table 1: Characteristics of cancer patients terminally ill (n=62)

Click here to view


Palliative medicine

Palliative medicines prescribed when patients were in their terminal stage are shown in [Table 1]. Palliative sedation therapy and DEX were offered in 31 (50%) and 24 (38.7%) patients, respectively. The comparison of palliative medicines prescribed to patients with and without infection is shown in [Table 2]. Palliative sedation therapy and DEX were used in both groups. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were used more frequently in patients with infection than those without (P=0.04) as shown in [Table 2].
Table 2: Comparison of palliative medicine offered in patients with and without infection

Click here to view


Site of infection and antibiotics prescribed

The distribution of infections by site and antibiotics prescribed is presented in [Table 3]. The most frequent site of infection was respiratory tract (n=27, 84.4%), followed by urinary tract (n=4, 12.5%). Two cases had pneumonia complicated with a UTI. Antibiotic therapies were performed in 30 of the 32 patients with infection (93.8%). The most common antibiotics prescribed were tazobactam/piperacillin (TAZ/PIPC) alone (n=16, 53.3%), followed by ceftriaxone (CTRX) alone (n=4, 13.3%).
Table 3: Infection sites which were treated by antibiotics and symptoms (n=30)

Click here to view


Bacteriological findings

Blood cultures were performed in 28 patients with infection (n=32, 87.5%). Sputum and urine cultures were performed in 22 (68.8%) and 12 (37.5%) patients, respectively. Four cases (n=28, 14.3%) showed positive blood cultures. Among all the courses of infection, the most common pathogens isolated were Staphylococcus aureus (n=32, 12.5%) and  Escherichia More Details coli (n=32, 12.5%), followed by Haemophilus influenzae and Klebsiella pneumonia [Table 4]. Of the four cases who showed positive blood cultures, two had UTI, one had cholangitis, and one had pneumonia.
Table 4: Pathogens isolated

Click here to view


Clinical outcomes

As for clinical courses, 3 of the 30 patients who received antibiotic therapy survived longer than 2 weeks. On the other hand, 23 of them died within 1 week after antibiotic therapy was started. Patients' symptom responses are shown in [Table 5]. Three of them experienced improved symptoms after antibiotic therapy. Twenty-seven patients were not confirmed as having any symptom improvement. Fever was improved in 12 (52.2%) and 14 (77.8%) cases in patients with and without infection, respectively. Other symptoms except for fever were not confirmed to show any improvement.
Table 5: Patients' symptoms confirmed on admission

Click here to view


There were no significant differences about symptom improvement after antibiotic therapy and/or palliative medicine in both groups [Table 5].

The comparison of median survival times of the three groups is shown in [Table 6]. There were no significant differences in median survival times in these groups.
Table 6: Comparison of median survival time in three groups

Click here to view


Therapeutic impact of blood culture

Four (14.3%) positive cultures were confirmed in blood obtained from 28 individual patients. Two of the four cases, one case with UTI and the other one with cholangitis complicated with UTI, had a change in the therapeutic regimen due to antibiotic susceptibility.


 » Discussion Top


Malignancy is a leading cause of death worldwide, and accounted for 7.6 million deaths (around 13% of all deaths) in 2008. Deaths from cancer are projected to continue to rise to over 11 million in 2030, and lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death worldwide. [13] Terminally ill patients with lung cancer are commonly complicated with respiratory tract infections. Physicians often have difficulty in treating infections in terminally ill cancer patients because there are no evidence-based protocols or guidelines. One-third of people die from cancer in Japan according to National Vital Statistics (2009-2010). [14] It is time that these clinical protocols or guidelines should be established.

We analyzed the necessity of antibiotics and blood cultures for infection in terminally ill cancer patients in this study. The therapeutic indication of blood cultures affected two cases (n=42, 4.4%) as described above. Both of them, which were diagnosed as UTI and cholangitis, led to a change in antibiotics according to the result of pathogens isolated. Although a blood culture is one of the most sensitive methods for the detection of bacteremia, sepsis, or infectious endocarditis, [5] the therapeutic impact of this examination is quite limited. Some clinicians previously reported that blood culture was not necessary for patients with both community-acquired [15],[16],[17] and hospital-acquired pneumonia [18],[19] because its therapeutic impacts were limited. In addition, repeated venous punctures while performing blood cultures would be stressful for patients as well as the medical staff as mentioned above. Nakagawa et al. demonstrated that antibiotic therapy improved patients' QOL, showing effectiveness for terminally ill patients. [6] We found that 2 of 30 cases who received antibiotic therapy (one with UTI, and the other with cholangitis) had improved symptoms related to infections as described above. In contrast, in the remaining 28 cases, blood cultures could not contribute to the treatment because all of them were on palliative sedation or were unconscious due to CO 2 narcosis. Ninety-eight percent of patients in our study had lung cancer. This is why our result did not show antibiotic therapy as effective among terminally ill cancer patients.

It is striking that 23 of the 30 (76.7%) patients who received antibiotic therapy died within 1 week after the therapy was begun, and 3 lived longer than 3 weeks. However, we found that none of them experienced improved symptoms. Mostly, terminally ill patients with lung cancer present with severe dyspnea, expectoration of much sputum, and sticky cough, resulting in palliative sedation therapy which is offered to them to ease their symptoms. [10],[11],[12] NSAIDs and DEX were commonly used for these patients in providing palliative care. It might be impossible to properly evaluate the efficacy of antibiotic therapy in the cancer patients by fever or laboratory indicators of an inflammation, such as CRP, ESR, etc., which could be masked by palliative medicines. In the case of terminally ill patients who are unconscious, we were wondering if antibiotics as well as blood cultures were necessary. Most physicians tend to hesitate to withhold antibiotic therapy for any infectious disease, even when patients are unconscious with a terminally staging cancer. Blood cultures or antibiotic therapy for terminally ill cancer patients who would not live more than 1 week might be without merit and only result in the increase of the medical cost as well as medical staff's labor. In Japan, discussing this kind of issue has been avoided. We are not saying that all antibiotic therapies for terminally ill cancer patients with infection are not useful. Clinicians must consider whether antibiotics should be prescribed or blood cultures should be performed based on patients' life expectancy and conscious state. We strongly believe that prescribing morphine, DEX, and NSAIDs for patients with infection, especially for those with respiratory infection, without performing blood cultures or antibiotic administration might be acceptable for symptom relief and saving medical staff's labor.

As for antibiotic therapy and bacteriological findings, although not all the pathogens isolated were considered as causative, they were within the coverage of empiric therapy. This illustrates that empiric antibiotic therapy would be sufficient and reasonable in terminally ill cancer patients for infection treatment without performing blood cultures, when necessary. We suggest that not using antibiotics but administering DEX, intravenous analgesics such as NSAIDs added to palliative sedation, would be one of the useful alternatives for those patients. In getting advance directives, it would be helpful to discuss with the patients and their family whether antibiotic therapy and a blood culture should be performed when there will be little or no merit.

In terms of medical cost savings, it is roughly estimated to save US $300 by eliminating each set of blood cultures and US $1470-1960 per patient by eliminating a 2-week-long antibiotic therapy regimen.

The limitation of our study is that it is a retrospective analysis based on a very small population. Also, we did not use an objective tool to evaluate the symptoms of terminally ill cancer patients. A prospective study using an objective tool will be necessary, and more cases are to be expected.

In conclusion, blood cultures have a limited value in terminally ill patients admitted in a palliative care unit. Antibiotic therapy might not be effective in improving symptoms in terminally ill patients with lung cancer. We suggest that not performing a blood culture and withholding an antibiotic therapy would be one choice for those with respiratory tract infections if patients' life expectancy is very short and there is no perceived clinical or QOL merit.


 » Acknowledgments Top


We are grateful for the diligent and thorough critical reading of our manuscript by Mr. John Wocher, Executive Vice President and Director, International Affairs/International Patient Services, Kameda Medical Center (Japan), and Mr. Michael Burke, Summer Intern from the University of Iowa at Kameda Medical Center.

 
 » References Top

1.Viscoli C. Management of infection in cancer patients. Studies of the EORTC International Antimicrobial Therapy Group (IATG). Eur J Cancer 2002;Suppl 4: S82-7.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Homsi J, Walsh D, Panta R, Lagman R, Nelson KA, Longworth DL. Infectious complications of advanced cancer. Support Care Cancer 2000;6:487-92.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Morant R, Hang-Jorg S. The management of infections in patients in palliative care. In: Doyle D, Hanks G, MacDonald N, editors. Oxford Textbook of Palliative Medicine. 3 rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1997. p. 378-83.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Vitetta L, Kenner D, Sali A. Bacterial infections in terminally ill hospice patients. J Pain Symptom Manage 2000;5:326-34.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Weinstein MP. Current blood culture methods and systems: Clinical concepts, technology, and interpretation of results. Clin Infect Dis 1996;1:40-6.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.Nakagawa S, Toya Y, Okamoto Y, Tsuneto S, Goya S, Tanimukai H, et al. Can anti-infective drugs improve the infection-related symptoms of patients with cancer during the terminal stages of their lives? J Palliat Med 2010;5:535-40.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.White PH, Kuhlenschmidt HL, Vancura BG, Navari RM. Antimicrobial use in patients with advanced cancer receiving hospice care. J Pain Symptom Manage 2003;5:438-43.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.Reinbolt RE, Shenk AM, White PH, Navari RM. Symptomatic treatment of infections in patients with advanced cancer receiving hospice care. J Pain Symptom Manage 2005;2:175-82.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.Clayton J, Fardell B, Hutton-Potts J, Webb D, Chye R. Parenteral antibiotics in a palliative care unit: Prospective analysis of current practice. Palliat Med 2003;1:44-8.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.Cherny NI, Radbruch L; Board of the European Association for Palliative Care. European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC) recommended framework for the use of sedation in palliative care. Palliat Med 2009;7:581-93.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.de Graeff A, Dean M. Palliative sedation therapy in the last weeks of life: A literature review and recommendations for standards. J Palliat Med 2007;1:67-85.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.Morita T, Bito S, Kurihara Y, Uchitomi Y. Development of a clinical guideline for palliative sedation therapy using the Delphi method. J Palliat Med 2005;4:716-29.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.World Health Organization. World Health Organization Home page. Available from: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs297/en/ [Last accessed on 2011 Oct 01].  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare in Japan. Annual Health, Labor and Welfare Report 2009-2010. Available from: http://www.mhlw.go.jp/english/wp/wp-hw4/ [Last accessed on 2011 Oct 01].  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.Campbell SG, Marrie TJ, Anstey R, Dickinson G, Ackroyd-Stolarz S. The contribution of blood cultures to the clinical management of adult patients admitted to the hospital with community-acquired pneumonia: A prospective observational study. Chest 2003;4:1142-50.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.Corbo J, Friedman B, Bijur P, Gallagher EJ. Limited usefulness of initial blood cultures in community acquired pneumonia. Emerg Med J 2004;4:446-8.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.Campbell SG, Marrie TJ, Anstey R, Ackroyd-Stolarz S, Dickinson G. Utility of blood cultures in the management of adults with community acquired pneumonia discharged from the emergency department. Emerg Med J 2003;6:521-3.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.Guidelines for the Management of Adults with Hospital-acquired, Ventilator-associated, and Healthcare-associated Pneumonia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2005;171:388-416.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.Luna CM, Videla A, Mattera J, Vay C, Famiglietti A, Vujacich P, et al. Blood cultures have limited value in predicting severity of illness and as a diagnostic tool in ventilator-associated pneumonia. Chest 1999;116:1075-84.  Back to cited text no. 19
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5], [Table 6]

This article has been cited by
1 Léčba infekcí u pacientů v paliativní symptomatické a terminální fázi onkologického onemocnéní | [Management of infections in palliative and terminal cancer care]
Sochor, M.
Klinicka Onkologie. 26; 5(323): 330
[Pubmed]
2 Document Design, synthesis, molecular modeling, and biological evaluation of sulfanilamide-imines derivatives as potential anticancer agents
Mohamed, S.S., Tamer, A.R., Bensaber, S.M.,Hermann, A., Gbaj, A.M.
Naunyn-Schmiedebergćs Archives of Pharmacology. 2013; 368(9): 813-822
[Pubmed]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
Online since 1st October '05
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow