| Article Access Statistics|
| Viewed||4296 |
| Printed||253 |
| Emailed||3 |
| PDF Downloaded||120 |
| Comments ||[Add] |
| Cited by others ||1 |
Click on image for details.
|Year : 2011 | Volume
| Issue : 2 | Page : 146-149
Hypnotherapy: Fact or Fiction: A review in palliative care and opinions of health professionals
Geetha Desai, Santosh K Chaturvedi, Srinivasa Ramachandra
Department of Psychiatry, Nimhans, Bengaluru, India
|Date of Web Publication||5-Sep-2011|
Department of Psychiatry, Nimhans, Bengaluru
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Context: Complementary medicine like hypnotherapy is often used for pain and palliative care. Health professionals vary in views about hypnotherapy, its utility, value, and attitudes.
Aims: To understand the opinions of health professionals on hypnotherapy.
Settings and Design: A semi-qualitative method to survey opinions of the health professionals from various disciplines attending a programme on hypnotherapy was conducted.
Materials and Methods : The survey form consisted of 32 statements about hypnosis and hypnotherapy. Participants were asked to indicate whether they agreed, disagreed, or were not sure about each statement. A qualitative feedback form was used to obtain further views about hypnotherapy.
Statistical Analysis Used: Percentage, frequency distribution.
Results: The sample consisted of 21 participants from various disciplines. Two-thirds of the participants gave correct responses to statements on dangerousness of hypnosis (90%), weak mind and hypnosis (86%), and hypnosis as therapy (81%). The participants gave incorrect responses about losing control in hypnosis (57%), hypnosis being in sleep (62%), and becoming dependent on hypnotist (62%). Participants were not sure if one could not hear the hypnotist one is not hypnotized (43%) about the responses on gender and hypnosis (38%), hypnosis leading to revealing secrets (23%).
Conclusions: Despite patients using complementary medicine services, often health professionals are unaware of the issues associated with these services. These myths may interfere in using hypnotherapy as therapeutic tool in palliative care. It is important for health professionals to have an appropriate and evidence-based understanding about the complementary therapies including hypnotherapy.
Keywords: Attitudes, Health professionals, Hypnotherapy
|How to cite this article:|
Desai G, Chaturvedi SK, Ramachandra S. Hypnotherapy: Fact or Fiction: A review in palliative care and opinions of health professionals. Indian J Palliat Care 2011;17:146-9
|How to cite this URL:|
Desai G, Chaturvedi SK, Ramachandra S. Hypnotherapy: Fact or Fiction: A review in palliative care and opinions of health professionals. Indian J Palliat Care [serial online] 2011 [cited 2021 Jan 25];17:146-9. Available from: https://www.jpalliativecare.com/text.asp?2011/17/2/146/84537
| » Introduction|| |
Complementary and alternative medicine is often used for pain and palliative care. It has become an important aspect of palliative and supportive cancer care. Hypnotherapy has been mired by various meanings. Often it is considered as a procedure used to revive the hidden truths in an individual. More often it is not considered as a therapeutic tool. It is sometimes considered as an unscientific method of treatment. Contrary to it, several clinical trials suggested that hypnotherapy can be useful in palliative care.  In a study conducted by Jacknow et al, 20 cancer patients who were receiving chemotherapy were randomly assigned to either hypnotherapy or no such treatment in addition to standard care. The results showed that hypnotherapy was associated with less nausea and vomiting and less need for antiemetic medication. Similarly, hypnotherapy has been shown in randomized controlled trials to reduce cancer-induced pain and cancer therapy-associated pain.  Genuis  summarized all published clinical trials of hypnotherapy and concluded that there is encouraging, but not compelling, evidence to suggest that hypnotherapy is helpful for controlling anxiety and pain as well as nausea and vomiting in cancer patients. Similarly, Rajasekaran et al. conducted a systematic review of hypnotherapy in terminally ill adult cancer patients and reported that hypnotherapy was used to treat a variety of symptoms, including pain, anxiety, and depression. The poor quality of the studies and heterogeneity of the study population limited further evaluation, and further research was required to understand the role of hypnotherapy in managing symptoms. A study conducted by Finlay and Jones  on outpatients attending hospice daily care reported that 61% of the sample who underwent hypnotherapy improved coping with their illness.
There have been surveys about the use of hypnotherapy in palliative care, views and attitudes of cancer patients about hypnotherapy, and views of health professionals about possible use of hypnotherapy in palliative care. A postal questionnaire survey  suggested that 70% of all departments of oncology in Britain routinely used at least one form of complementary medicine in the palliative cancer care setting. Acupuncture, aromatherapy, enzyme therapy, homeopathy, hypnotherapy, massage, reflexology, relaxation techniques, and spiritual healing were frequently used forms of treatment. ,
Health professionals have varied views about hypnotherapy, its utility, value, and attitudes. Sohn and Loveland-Cook  examined clinicians who recommended hypnosis and other complementary and alternative therapies: they determined that their knowledge of these modalities was minimal, and their primary source of information on the subject was through personal experience and the lay literature. Another study done by Hall and Giles-Corti,  which explored the knowledge, attitudes, and referral patterns of general practitioners in Australia concerning complementary and alternative therapies including hypnosis, noted that 90% had been approached by patients for advice on complementary therapies; 75% had referred patients for complementary therapies that included hypnosis among the most common. Less than half of those physicians surveyed had ever studied about even one complementary therapy and 60% wished further training. Pirotta et al found that general practitioners underestimate their patients' use of complementary therapies. Although 80% had referred patients for acupuncture, hypnosis, and meditation, only 20% had any training in hypnosis. Another study in Australia  assessed radiation and medical oncologists' attitudes and knowledge about complementary therapies. This group considered meditation, hypnosis, and acupuncture to be the most likely to be helpful and reported self-identified gaps in knowledge about non-traditional therapies. Elkins and Wall  assessed the attitudes, experience, training levels, and interest in future education regarding the use of hypnosis among physicians and residents. They found that 79% of physicians and 67% of residents were interested in pursuing training regarding hypnosis.
However, although complementary and alternative medicine is commonly used by patients for all kinds of health problems, such surveys on hypnotherapy, its utility, perception, and attitudes have not been reported. Health professionals may not be aware of these practices, because there are hardly any published articles on this theme. Despite hypnotherapy being used in Indian settings, there are no published data on the perceptions of health professionals about hypnotherapy. This survey was conducted to understand the myths and misconceptions of health professionals about hypnotherapy.
| » Materials and Methods|| |
This survey was conducted at National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, India, by pain education group. A series of workshops were conducted on chronic pain assessment and management on various themes such as hypnotherapy, fibromyalgia, neuropathic pain, cancer pain, cognitive behavior therapy, phantom pain, and somatoform pain disorders. Here we present the observations collected during the workshop on hypnotherapy. A semi-qualitative method was used to survey the myths and misconceptions about hypnotherapy. Health professionals from various disciplines attending this program on hypnotherapy formed the sample for the survey. The survey form consisted of 32 statements about hypnosis and hypnotherapy prepared by a trained hypnotherapy consultant. Each statement had three options, namely, agree, disagree, and not sure. Participants were asked to indicate their options. The participants were also asked to give in their details like name (optional), years of experience in health profession, gender, and educational qualification. A feedback form was used to collect qualitative information and views about hypnotherapy and the workshop. The participants were assured about confidentiality and the use of these data only for academic purpose. Informed consent was sought for this purpose. The correctness and incorrectness of views and opinions about hypnosis were validated by a qualified hypnotherapist (SR).
The data were computed, and frequency distribution of different statements was derived. The views were classified as correct, incorrect, and not sure responses.
| » Results|| |
Twenty-one health professionals from various disciplines participated in this workshop and survey. The group consisted of 14 (67%) men and 7 (33%) women. The mean age in years of the group was 27.19 ± 1.81. The mean years of experience were 2.96 ± 1.97. The participants were from psychiatry (12, 57%), psychology (3, 14%), and nursing (6, 29%). The results of the statement responses are given in [Table 1],[Table 2],[Table 3].
Nearly two-thirds of the participants gave correct responses to statements on dangerousness of hypnosis (90%), weak mind and hypnosis (86%), hypnosis being magic and occult magic (86%), hypnosis as therapy (81%), and being asleep during hypnosis (71%) [Table 1].
The participants gave incorrect responses about losing control in hypnosis (57%), hypnosis being in sleep (62%), becoming dependent on hypnotist (62%), women are less hypnotizable then men(62%), and to be able to recall everything that has happened to them (57%) [Table 2].
Participants were not sure if one could not hear the hypnotist one is not hypnotized (43%) about the responses on gender and hypnosis (38%), hypnosis leading to revealing secrets (23%), and whether it will work on certain people (23%) [Table 3].
| » Discussion|| |
The above survey details the views, myths, and misconceptions about hypnotherapy among health professionals. However, it should be noted that the participants were mainly from mental health background and were perhaps better informed about hypnotherapy. It is likely that other health professionals may have inadequate knowledge and misperceptions about hypnotherapy. Hypnotherapy is being practiced since many decades for various disorders. However, only lately there has been evidence for its use in the palliative care. , The attitudes of health professionals toward complementary medicine and hypnotherapy might be the reason for it is under utility in palliative services.
Despite patients using complementary medicine services, often and health professionals are unaware of the issues associated with these methods. This survey highlights the fact that two-thirds of the participants gave correct responses to half of the statements in survey form. The basic tenets of hypnotherapy were identified correctly by the participants. However, participants were either not sure or gave incorrect responses to statements on hypnosis being only a superficial psychological phenomenon and that people will reveal their hidden secrets.
These myths may interfere in using hypnotherapy as therapeutic tool in palliative care.
It is important for health professionals to have an appropriate and evidence-based understanding about the complementary therapies including hypnotherapy. This survey indicates that certain health professionals have their facts right about hypnotherapy; however, fictions prevail too!
| » References|| |
|1.||Sellick SM, Zaza C. Critical review of 5 nonpharmacologic strategies for managing cancer pain. Cancer Prev Control 1998;2:7-14. |
|2.||Jacknow DS, Tschann JM, Link MP, Boyce WT. Hypnosis in the prevention of chemotherapy-related nausea and vomiting in children: A prospective study. J Dev Behav Pediatr 1994;15:258-64. |
|3.||Wall VJ, Womack W. Hypnotic versus active cognitive strategies for alleviation of procedural distress in pediatric oncology patients. Am J Clin Hypn 1989;31:181-91. |
|4.||Genuis ML. The use of hypnosis in helping cancer patients control anxiety, pain, and emesis: A review of recent empirical studies. Am J Clin Hypn 1995;37:316-25. |
|5.||Rajasekaran M, Edmonds PM, Higginson IL. Systematic review of hypnotherapy for treating symptoms in terminally ill adult cancer patients. Palliat Med 2005;19:418-26. |
|6.||Finlay IG and Jones OL. Hypnotherapy in palliative care. J R S Med 1996;89:493-6. |
|7.||White P. Complementary medicine treatment of cancer: A survey of provision. Complement Ther Med 1998;6:10-3. |
|8.||Ernst E, Cassileth BR. The prevalence of complementary/alternative medicine in cancer: A systematic review. Cancer 1998;83:777-82. |
|9.||Schraub S. Unproven methods in cancer: A worldwide problem. Support Care Cancer 2000;8:10-5. |
|10.||Sohn PM, Loveland-Cook CA. Nurse Practitioner's knowledge of complementary alternative health care: Foundation for practice J Adv Nurs 2002;39: 9-16. |
|11.||Hall K, Giles-Corti B. Complementary therapies and the general practitioner, a survey of Perth's general practitioners. Aust Fam Physician 2000;29:602-6. |
|12.||Pirotta MX, Cohen MM, Kotsirilos V, Farish SJ. Complementary therapies: Have they become accepted in general practice? Med J Aust 2000;172:105-9. |
|13.||Newell S, Sanson-Fisher RW. Australian oncologist self-reported knowledge and attitudes about non-traditional therapies used by cancer patients. Med J Aust 2000;172:100-13. |
|14.||Elkins GR, Wall VJ. Medical referrals for hypnotherapy: Opinions of physicians, residents, family practice outpatients and psychiatry outpatients. Am J Clin Hypn1996;38:254-62. |
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]
|This article has been cited by|
||Pain with no cause! Nursesę perception
| ||Desai, G. and Chaturvedi, S.K. |
| ||Indian Journal of Palliative Care. 2012; 18(3): 162-164 |