Indian J Palliat Care Home 
 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2014  |  Volume : 20  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 112--115

Palliative approach in advanced pelvic osteosarcoma: a single centre experience of a rare disease

Ritesh Kumar1, Rakesh Kapoor1, Divya Khosla1, Narendra Kumar1, Pramod Kumar Singh1, Mahendra Kumar2, SC Sharma1,  
1 Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
2 Department of Pathology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India

Correspondence Address:
Ritesh Kumar
Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh
India

Abstract

Background: Pelvic osteosarcoma is a rare and aggressive malignant neoplasm with poor outcomes. It represents only 5% of all osteosarcomas. The authors present our institute«SQ»s experience in management and outcomes of five successive patients of pelvic osteosarcoma. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed five patients of pelvis osteosarcoma treated in our institute from September 2008 to December 2010. Clinical characteristics and treatment (CCT) modality in form of surgery and chemotherapy were noted. Statistical analysis was done with regards to progression-free survival (PFS) using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Results: The median age of the patients was 16.0 years. The median duration of symptoms was 9 months. One patient had lung metastases at presentation. All patients received systemic chemotherapy. One patient underwent surgery in the form of limb sparing approach. Three patients had partial response to treatment, one had complete response, and one had progressive disease. Median duration of PFS was 7 months only. Conclusions: Pelvic osteosarcomas are rare neoplasms with aggressive growth patterns. Survival results are poor in view of advanced stage of presentation and difficult surgical approaches. The combined modality approach is needed to improve the results.



How to cite this article:
Kumar R, Kapoor R, Khosla D, Kumar N, Singh PK, Kumar M, Sharma S C. Palliative approach in advanced pelvic osteosarcoma: a single centre experience of a rare disease.Indian J Palliat Care 2014;20:112-115


How to cite this URL:
Kumar R, Kapoor R, Khosla D, Kumar N, Singh PK, Kumar M, Sharma S C. Palliative approach in advanced pelvic osteosarcoma: a single centre experience of a rare disease. Indian J Palliat Care [serial online] 2014 [cited 2020 Sep 21 ];20:112-115
Available from: http://www.jpalliativecare.com/text.asp?2014/20/2/112/132624


Full Text

 INTRODUCTION



Pelvic osteosarcomas are rare malignant neoplasms comprising only 5% of all osteosarcomas. [1],[2] Pelvic osteosarcomas have poor prognosis as they are often diagnosed in an advanced stage with a large tumor size. [3] The management of pelvic osteosarcoma is challenging because it is difficult to achieve a complete surgical excision that results in local recurrence and progression. [4] With the use of multiagent chemotherapy (CCT) and improvement in surgical techniques, the results are improving as compared to historical controls. [5],[6] Although there are few reports on additional radiotherapy (RT) after tumor excision with inadequate margins, the effect of RT for local tumor control remains unknown. [7],[8] We herein report our institutional experience of five successive patients of pelvic osteosarcomas being treated from September 2008 to December 2010.

 MATERIALS AND METHODS



Patient population and initial evaluation

We retrospectively reviewed the patients of pelvic osteosarcomas from September 2008 to December 2010 treated in our institute. The total number of patients were 5. We reviewed the records of these patients to extract the following information: Age, sex, clinical symptoms, histology, radiology (CT/MRI), tumor extent, and extent of surgical resection, chemotherapy (regimen, number of cycles), toxicity, response, progression, metastases, and death. Metastatic workup for distant metastases included CECT of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis and bone scintigraphy. Laboratory studies included blood chemistry (electrolytes, liver, and kidney function tests), and a complete blood count was performed.

Pathological review and staging

Pathology reports were obtained for all patients and the tumors were classified according to the histopathological subtype. Staging was based on the surgical, radiological, and pathological criteria as per the TNM staging system.

Treatment

Surgery and CCT was used in the treatment. Systemic CCT was administered with a regimen comprising cisplatin and adriamycin 3 weekly for 3-6 cycles. Only one patient underwent primary surgery in form of local excision of the residual tumor after systemic CCT. The median number of CCT cycles was 6.

Follow up

The period between the first complaint and diagnosis was registered as symptom duration. Survival, recurrence, and progression information were collected through chart review, patient, or relative contact. Response evaluation was noted both clinically and radiologically and response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) were applied. [9]

Statistical analysis

SPSS v 15 was used for statistical analysis. The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed for analyzing progression-free survival (PFS). [10]

 RESULTS



Patient characteristics

Patient characteristics are summarized in [Table 1]. Between September 2008 and December 2010, five patients of pelvic osteosarcoma were registered in our department. The median age of the patients was 16.0 years and ranges from 5 years to 38 years. The median duration of symptoms was 9 months. Pain in the pelvis was the most common symptom followed by the awareness of swelling and neuropathic symptoms. All the patients had locally advanced tumors with median size of 10 cm that ranged from 6 to 12 cm. On histopathological analysis, all patients had classical osteosarcoma histology. On metastatic workup, one patient had lung metastases.{Table 1}

Clinical outcomes

After treatment completion, patients were assessed for response both clinically and radiologically. One patient was asymptomatic, three patients had significant improvement in symptoms, and one patient had no improvement in symptoms. As per the RECIST criteria, one patient had complete response (CR), three patients had partial response (PR), and one patient had progressive disease (PD). Palliative RT to the local site was delivered to the four patients who did not undergo surgery. Symptomatic treatment in form of analgesics as per WHO ladder was prescribed. The median duration of follow-up was 8 months. Median duration of PFS was 7 months and mean duration of PFS was 8 months.

Treatment toxicity and compliance

There were no surgical complications in the one patient who underwent surgery in form of local excision. CCT toxicity was seen in three patients in form of grade 1-2 hematological toxicity.

 DISCUSSION



Pelvic osteosarcoma is rare and consists only 5% of all osteosarcomas. [1],[2] Pelvic osteosarcomas are regarded as a highly malignant tumor with frequent recurrence and poor survival. [4] Spread of the tumor is mostly by local extension but hematogeneous spread does occur, most commonly to the lungs and liver. They are usually present in locally advanced stages in view of vague initial symptoms. The optimal management of pelvic osteosarcomas remains unclear because of the rarity of the disease in adults. Treatment strategies reviewed in the literature include local surgical excision, systemic chemotherapy (CCT), and radiotherapy (RT). [6],[11]

In general, the treatment of extremity osteosarcoma involves excision of the tumor with an adequate surgical margin after systemic CCT. Chemotherapeutic agents commonly used are cisplatin, adriamycin, methotrexate cyclophosphamide, and ifosfamide. [12],[13] The regimen used in the patients in our series constituted cisplatin and adriamycin. However, in pelvic osteosarcomas, the tumor volumes changes little because of poor response to CCT. Surgery is also difficult and associated with marked morbidity. The surgical approaches involved ranges from hemipelvectomy to limb sparing approaches. [14],[15] The European Cooperative Osteosarcoma Study Group reported 67 patients of pelvic osteosarcomas with a median age of 20 years and range up to 63 years. [13] Of these, 50 underwent surgical resection, 38 limb-sparing and 12 hemipelvectomies. Fifty percent of patients who had resections had positive residual disease. The overall 5-year survival was only 27%. One of the patient underwent surgery in form of local excision (limb sparing approach) in our series.

In 1998, Kawai et al. reported a cohort of 40 patients with pelvic osteosarcoma with a median age of 25 years and range up to 76-year old. [6] The 5-year OS for the whole group was 34%, with a 10% 5-year survival for patients with unresectable tumors and 41% 5-year survival for patients with resections. Fuchs et al. reported the OS for patients with pelvic osteosarcoma treated during a 20-year period. [16] In their cohort, the mean age was 34 years with an upper limit of 66 years. They found that 13 of 30 patients did not have an adequate tumor-free margin and the 5-year OS was only 38%. The survival in our series was poor and all the patients in our series presented in locally advanced stages and one patient had lung metastases at presentation. Median duration of PFS was 7 months and mean duration of PFS was 8 months in our series.

Pelvic site itself confers poor prognosis in osteosarcoma. [17] Other poor prognostic factors reported in the literature are large tumor size, metastases at presentation, and no or intralesional surgery. [17],[18],[19] Alternate therapies, including the use of standard external beam or proton radiation therapy, could be considered for patients with tumors that are not completely resected or unresectable. [7],[8] Hernberg et al. reported the role of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in inoperable nonextremity osteosarcomas. [20] RT relieved symptoms efficiently and five of the seven patients were alive 5 years after treatment. With a lack of randomized trials assessing these modalities in patients with unresectable osteosarcoma, a definitive recommendation is still unclear.

Overall, pelvic osteosarcoma is a rare and aggressive neoplasm with poor prognosis. Improvements in surgical technique may lead to improvement in prognosis, although many patients still will not have tumors that can be resected. Improved surgical or medical therapy is needed, and patients with pelvic osteosarcoma may warrant alternate or experimental therapy. Palliative RT and supportive care remains an important component in the management of locally advanced pelvic osteosarcoma.

References

1Fahey M, Spanier SS, Vander Griend RA. Osteosarcoma of the pelvis. A clinical and histopathological study of twenty-five patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1992;74:321-30.
2Huvos AG. Bone tumors: Diagnosis, treatment and prognosis. 2 nd ed. 1987.
3Wurtz LD, Peabody TD, Simon MA. Delay in the diagnosis and treatment of primary bone sarcoma of the pelvis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1999;81:317-25.
4Grimer RJ, Carter SR, Tillman RM, Spooner D, Mangham DC, Kabukcuoglu Y. Osteosarcoma of the pelvis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1999;81:796-802.
5Bielack SS, Wulff B, Delling G, Göbel U, Kotz R, Ritter J, et al. Osteosarcoma of the trunk treated by multimodal therapy: Experience of the Cooperative Osteosarcoma study group (COSS). Med Pediatr Oncol 1995;24:6-12.
6Kawai A, Huvos AG, Meyers PA, Healey JH. Osteosarcoma of the pelvis. Oncologic results of 40 patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998;348:196-207.
7Aledavood seyed A, Amirabadi A, Memar B. Non surgical treatment of sacral osteosarcoma. Iran J Cancer Prev 2012;5:46-9.
8Schwarz R, Bruland O, Cassoni A, Schomberg P, Bielack S. The role of radiotherapy in oseosarcoma. Cancer Treat Res 2009;152:147-64.
9Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 2009;45:228-47.
10Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations. J Am Stat Assoc 1958;53:457-81.
11Estrada-Aguilar J, Greenberg H, Walling A, Schroer K, Black T, Morse S, et al. Primary treatment of pelvic osteosarcoma. Report of five cases. Cancer 1992;69:1137-45.
12Demiralp B, Maran A, Okuno SH, Sarkar G, Yaszemski MJ. Osteosarcoma : An evaluation of current diagnosis. Treat Chemother 2011;6:18-23.
13Ozaki T, Flege S, Kevric M, Lindner N, Maas R, Delling G, et al. Osteosarcoma of the pelvis: Experience of the Cooperative Osteosarcoma Study Group. J Clin Oncol 2003;21:334-41.
14Huth JF, Eckardt JJ, Pignatti G, Eilber FR. Resection of malignant bone tumors of the pelvic girdle without extremity amputation. Arch Surg 1988;123:1121-4.
15Carter SR, Eastwood DM, Grimer RJ, Sneath RS. Hindquarter amputation for tumours of the musculoskeletal system. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1990;72:490-3.
16Fuchs B, Hoekzema N, Larson DR, Inwards CY, Sim FH. Osteosarcoma of the Pelvis: Outcome analysis of surgical treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009;467:510-8.
17Bielack SS, Kempf-Bielack B, Delling G, Exner GU, Flege S, Helmke K, et al. Prognostic factors in high-grade osteosarcoma of the extremities or trunk: An analysis of 1,702 patients treated on neoadjuvant cooperative osteosarcoma study group protocols. J Clin Oncol 2002;20:776-90.
18Bieling P, Rehan N, Winkler P, Helmke K, Maas R, Fuchs N, et al. Tumor size and prognosis in aggressively treated osteosarcoma. J Clin Oncol 1996;14:848-58.
19Kawai A, Healey JH, Boland PJ, Lin PP, Huvos AG, Meyers PA. Prognostic factors for patients with sarcomas of the pelvic bones. Cancer 1998;82:851-9.
20Hernberg MM, Kivioja AH, Böhling TO, Janes RJ, Wiklund TA. Chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of inoperable high-grade osteosarcoma. Med Oncol 2011;28:1475-80.