A randomized placebo-controlled trial evaluating the analgesic effect of salmon calcitonin in refractory bone metastasis pain
Correspondence Address: Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None DOI: 10.4103/IJPC.IJPC_167_19
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Keywords: Bone metastasis pain, randomized trial, salmon calcitonin
Bone metastasis is a major cause of morbidity causing pain in cancer patients, especially of breast, lung, and genitourinary (prostate and kidney) origin. Pharmacotherapy is the mainstay for the control of metastatic cancer pain as recommended by the WHO pain guidelines. However, some patients may not respond to analgesics used concomitantly even with palliative radiotherapy (RT) and intravenous (IV) bisphosphonates.
Salmon calcitonin has been postulated to reduce bone resorption, to increase circulating endogenous opioids, and to have endorphin receptor agonist activity (Gennari, 1989; Spigset, 1993; and Mystakidou, 1999). Hence, injection calcitonin may be an option to control refractory bone pain. Calcitonin is also postulated to reduce bone complications, for example, hypercalcemia, fractures, and nerve compression.
This study was undertaken to assess the effectiveness of injection salmon calcitonin for controlling metastatic bone pain in breast, lung, and prostate cancers where routine analgesics (paracetamol, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and opioids) and bisphosphonates have failed and chemotherapy and RT have shown poor response.
This randomized trial was undertaken consequent to the approval of institutional ethics and review board at a tertiary care cancer center. All patients referred to pain clinic who had moderate-to-severe refractory pain with bone metastasis having received RT were screened for inclusion. Those who fitted into the laid down criteria were recruited. Informed consents were obtained from patients explaining the entire trial details in the language best understood by them. Proof of evidence for bone metastasis was identified by X-ray, bone scan, or magnetic resonance imaging. All patients reported to the cancer pain clinic with bone metastasis were screened for possible inclusion into the trial.
The patients were randomized according to a computer-generated random number table into two groups: Group A received subcutaneous injection of the study drug (salmon calcitonin 100 IU: 1 ml) and Group B received placebo similarly (1-ml normal saline), both of which were provided as preformed 1-ml ampoules by Shreya Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai, Maharashtra, India. All patients were admitted for 2 days either receiving the study drug (Group A) or placebo (Group B). Drugs were administered at a dose of 2 ml subcutaneously (SC) every 6 hourly for the first 48 h. Thereafter, 2-ml drug was administered once daily SC as a maintenance dose for 12 days on a domiciliary basis consequent to negative prior intradermal sensitivity test.
Tablet calcium carbonate 500 mg with Vitamin D3 250 IU was supplemented during 14 days of injection calcitonin therapy to prevent any incidence of hypocalcemia. Tablet ondansetron 8 mg was given during the calcitonin therapy as an antiemetic. Pain assessment was done using a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS, 0–10) at baseline; during the treatment 6 hourly for 2 days; and then on 7th, 14th, and 30th days. Serum calcium levels before and after the therapy were estimated.
All patients received analgesics (diclofenac 50 mg TDS with omeprazole 20 mg OD, oral morphine 30 mg controlled release preparation twice a day, and oral morphine 10 mg for breakthrough pain). The target pain score was <4/10 on movement. All patients received laxatives at night.
The patients were also assessed for bone metastases-related complications (hypercalcemia, bone fracture, nerve root, and bone marrow compression) during the 3-month observational period.
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Quality of life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C 30) was employed to assess the quality of life, and the scores were compared using repeated measures analysis between the groups. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS software version 24 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). Data were presented as mean and median (interquartile range [IQR]). Continuous variables were analyzed by Mann–Whitney test, and categorical data were analyzed by Chi-square test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
This randomized study included 11 females and 12 males. Age ranged from 32 to 79 years. Group A (study group) included 12 patients and Group B (placebo) included 11 patients. This study included patients with moderate-to-severe pain having lung (10), breast (11), and prostate (2) cancers [Table 1].
On admission, prior to randomization, all patients had moderate-to-severe pain, with a median pain score (at rest) of 5.0 (IQR: 4–6.25) and on movement of 6.0 (IQR: 6–7). Within 48 h after commencement of therapy, pain was found to be lower though not significantly in Group A [Figure 1], with reduced requirement of rescue doses of morphine [Figure 2]. On the 14th day after completion of drug therapy, in the study group, one patient had no pain, 7 had mild, 2 had moderate pain, 2 were lost to follow-up, and one patient did not complete the full study drug regimen. In the control group, 7/11 had moderate and 4 had mild pain. At 30 days, only one patient had moderate pain in the study group, but in the control group, 7/11 had moderate pain, 2 had mild pain, and 2 were lost to follow-up. No patients in the study group required rescue analgesia except one. On movement, difference was found to be statistically significant at 14 (P = 0.046) and 30 days (P = 0.016), but no difference was seen at 90 days [Figure 3].
Quality of life
Physical function [Figure 4] and global health [Figure 5] were found to be better in the study group but not statistically significant at 14, 30, and 90 days. Fatigue was lower in the study group at 30 and 90 days. One patient developed hypocalcemia after injection calcitonin. Three patients in the study group and four in the control group died during the 90 days' period due to disease progression. Pain was lower as assessed on the symptom scale of EORTC QLQ 30 in the study group on days 14, 30, and 90 days [Figure 6].
In the study group, three patients had nausea and three had vomiting, and in the control group, one patient had nausea and no one had vomiting. No allergic reaction to drugs was observed in either group; however, one patient in the study group developed tetany during high-dose calcitonin therapy. One patient in the study group and two in control group developed bone fracture. Nerve compression was observed in three patients in the control group and one in the study group.
Salmon calcitonin has been used in bone metastases pain, and its pain-relieving activity is due to its action of inhibition of osteoclysis. Its central analgesic property has been supported by its action through subarachnoid administration and generation of beta endorphin-like activity in serum. Encouraging results were shown in hormone-sensitive tumors such as breast and prostate; however, an appropriate size randomized trial has never been conducted to determine its exact role in bone metastases pain. Therefore, the analgesic action of salmon calcitonin remains incompletely understood.
In the present study, injection salmon calcitonin was administered in sufficient loading dose to induce the inhibitory osteoclastic activity with a low-dose maintenance daily injectable for 14 days to elucidate its action in different cancer-related bone metastasis conditions with refractory pain in previously RT-treated patients.
This study found a significant reduction in pain after injection salmon calcitonin after completion of injection therapy at 14 and 30 days' assessment. No patients in the study group required rescue analgesia after 18 h on injection. There was a statistically significant difference in rescue analgesics required between the groups during 2 days' hospitalization. On evaluation of quality-of-life indicators, global health and physical and social well-being were better at 30 and 90 days in the study group as compared to that of the control group; however, it could not reach a statistical significance, which may be attributed to the small sample size of the study. Calcitonin has been postulated to reduce bone resorption, to increase circulating endogenous opioids, and to have endorphin receptor agonist activity.,, Currently, the use of calcitonin for the relief of metastatic bone pain is not very common, and little information is available about its use in this context. It has potential efficacy in lowering pain and improving bone density, thereby lowering the risk of fractures is under investigation. First, randomized controlled trial (RCT) using injection calcitonin 200 IU QID only for 48 h showed good pain relief up to 1–2 weeks after the commencement of therapy in 22 patients. A similar study conducted a nonrandomized trial on 22 patients with SC infusion of calcitonin and reported reduction of pain intensity from the mean baseline value of 4.43–1.17 (Visual Analog Scale), which was observed in 85% (18/22) of the patients. The study suggested that calcitonin in high doses may be a useful adjuvant analgesic when combined with low doses of morphine in continuous SC administration for the management of metastatic bone pain. Our study results showed similar results in agreement with Hindley et al. and Mystakidou et al., Unfortunately, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2003, concluded that due to limited available evidence, use of calcitonin may not be supported for controlling pain arising out of bone metastases. Previous two studies by Roth, 1986, including forty women with carcinoma breast and by Blomqvist, 1988, with fifty breast cancer women did not provide quantifiable data for pain reduction. During the same period, an open study of 34 lung patients by Schiraldi et al. reported excellent pain relief with 400 IU dose/day. An open-label study (2006) showed that high-dose IV calcitonin with steroids may reduce pain and analgesic requirement in 10% of patients. This randomized, double-blind trial should be considered as a pilot study for conducting a large RCT on calcitonin for bone pain, which may show its exact effectiveness to control pain in refractory clinical settings.
Bone metastasis pain was reduced for 1 month after the commencement of high-dose subcutaneous salmon calcitonin therapy. A large randomized, double-blind trial on injection calcitonin is required to further evaluate its analgesic effect in metastatic bone pain.
We acknowledge with thanks to Shreya Life Sciences (P) Ltd. for providing blinded ampoules of the drugs for the study.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
The company provided blinded ampoules of the drugs.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6]