| Article Access Statistics|
| Viewed||205 |
| Printed||8 |
| Emailed||0 |
| PDF Downloaded||18 |
| Comments ||[Add] |
Click on image for details.
|Year : 2020 | Volume
| Issue : 1 | Page : 140-141
Ultrasound-guided glossopharyngeal nerve block at pharyngeal wall level in a patient with carcinoma tongue
Prashant Sirohiya, Vinod Kumar, Pratishtha Yadav, Sachidanand Jee Bharti
Department of Onco-Anaesthesia and Palliative Medicine, Dr. BRA IRCH, AIIMS, New Delhi, India
|Date of Submission||26-Jul-2019|
|Date of Acceptance||30-Aug-2019|
|Date of Web Publication||28-Jan-2020|
Dr. Vinod Kumar
Department of Onco-Anaesthesia and Palliative Medicine, Dr. BRA IRCH, AIIMS, New Delhi
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Glossopharyngeal nerve (GPN) block is used for pain management in patients' head and neck malignancy. The GPN is a mixed nerve containing both motor and sensory fibers. The usual approaches for GPN blocks are usually topical, intraoral, or peristyloid. Topical anesthesia may be difficult in patients with limited mouth opening or when there is inflammation in the area of interest. Intraoral and peristyloid approaches have risk of inadvertent neurovascular injection. The intraoral technique may lead to long-lasting oropharyngeal discomfort. Hence, GPN block is done at the pharyngeal wall level for pain relief.
Keywords: Glossopharyngeal nerve, pain, ultrasound
|How to cite this article:|
Sirohiya P, Kumar V, Yadav P, Bharti SJ. Ultrasound-guided glossopharyngeal nerve block at pharyngeal wall level in a patient with carcinoma tongue. Indian J Palliat Care 2020;26:140-1
|How to cite this URL:|
Sirohiya P, Kumar V, Yadav P, Bharti SJ. Ultrasound-guided glossopharyngeal nerve block at pharyngeal wall level in a patient with carcinoma tongue. Indian J Palliat Care [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 Apr 6];26:140-1. Available from: http://www.jpalliativecare.com/text.asp?2020/26/1/140/276851
| » Introduction|| |
Glossopharyngeal nerve (GPN) block is an interventional technique that has been used for pain management in patients with malignancies of head and neck. The GPN is a mixed nerve containing both motor and sensory fibers. Its motor fibers innervate the stylopharyngeus muscle and sensory portion innervates the posterior third of the tongue, palatine tonsil, and mucous membranes of the mouth and pharynx. Usual approaches for GPN blocks are usually topical, intraoral, or peristyloid. Topical anesthesia may be difficult in patients with limited mouth opening or when there is inflammation in the area of interest, and also, it covers only the mucosa. Intraoral and peristyloid approaches have risk of inadvertent neurovascular injection. The intraoral technique is unpopular in clinical practice and it is associated with long-lasting oropharyngeal discomfort. Peristyloid GPN block may lead to an inadvertent block of adjacent vagus and hypoglossal nerve. We report a case of carcinoma tongue who underwent ultrasound (US)-guided GPN blockade at the pharyngeal wall level.
| » Case Report|| |
A 65-year-old male was referred to the pain clinic with pain in the left side of the face and oral cavity radiating to left ear and head, which aggravates on deglutition. The patient had moderately differentiated squamous cell carcinoma of the left base of tongue, for which he had chemotherapy and radiation therapy. The patient reported pain score of 10/10 on numeric rating scale (NRS), where 0 represents no pain and 10 is worst imaginable pain. His pain was inadequately controlled on tablet morphine 120 mg/day, tablet paracetamol 3 g/day, tablet etoricoxib 120 mg/day, and tablet gabapentin 1800 mg/day. He had undergone diagnostic and therapeutic per-styloid GPN block by landmark approach 1 month ago, which provides him <25% pain relief for 8–10 days. We decided to perform distal GPN blockade at the pharyngeal wall level, as described by Ažman et al. in their study on cadavers and healthy volunteers.
After obtaining informed consent, the patient was placed supine with their necks extended. US scan was performed using a high-frequency 15–6 MHz, 38-mm linear US transducer (Edge II; SonoSite, Inc., Bothell, Washington). The transducer was initially positioned over the lateral part of the hyoid bone in the transverse plane. The lateral tip of the probe was then rotated cephalad to keep in line with the mandibular angle [Figure 1]. In this position, the pharyngeal wall was identified [Figure 2]. In-plane approach was used, and 2 ml of 2% lignocaine for the diagnostic blockade was given just above the pharyngeal wall using 5 cm 21-G insulated needle (Stimuplex® A - B. Braun Melsungen AG, Germany). The patient reported a pain score of 1/10 on NRS after 30 min of the blockade.
The next day using the same technique, at the same location as the diagnostic block, 1 mL of 2% lignocaine (neon) +2 ml (8 mg) of dexamethasone injected to the target site. No tachycardia, infection, or hematoma developed. No hoarseness and dysphagia developed. After this intervention, the patient scored his pain as 0/10 on NRS. Oral medicines were tapered off over 1 month on a weekly follow-up. The patient's NRS scores stayed at 0/10 after 2 months.
| » Discussion|| |
The GPN block at the pharyngeal level presented here provides less discomfort for the patients. Real-time US visualization of neurovascular structures makes the procedure safer, especially in patients with altered anatomy (i.e., postradiation therapy, previous surgeries). Bean-Lijewski reported upper airway obstruction after per-styloid GPN blocks for pain control in pediatric tonsillectomies because of unintentional hypoglossal nerve blockade. Unintentional vagus and hypoglossal nerve blockade can cause tachycardia with secondary hypertension. Weakness of the trapezius muscle was also observed as a potential complication of GPN block caused by accessory nerve blockade.
To summarize, US-guided GPN block at the pharyngeal wall level may be an alternative to intraoral or peristyloid approach of GPN blockade. Further studies are needed.
Declaration of patient consent
The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| » References|| |
Mikula I. Craniofacial neuralgias. Acta Med Croatica 2008;62:163-72.
Waldman S. Atlas of Interventional Pain Management. 3rd
ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2009. p. 93-6.
Bean-Lijewski JD. Glossopharyngeal nerve block for pain relief after pediatric tonsillectomy: Retrospective analysis and two cases of life-threatening upper airway obstruction from an interrupted trial. Anesth Analg 1997;84:1232-8.
Ažman J, Stopar Pintaric T, Cvetko E, Vlassakov K. Ultrasound-guided glossopharyngeal nerve block: A cadaver and a volunteer sonoanatomy study. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2017;42:252-8.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2]