| Article Access Statistics|
| Viewed||1320 |
| Printed||71 |
| Emailed||0 |
| PDF Downloaded||98 |
| Comments ||[Add] |
Click on image for details.
|Year : 2019 | Volume
| Issue : 2 | Page : 169-171
Pharmacogenomics in palliative medicine
Head, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Manipal College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India
|Date of Web Publication||16-Apr-2019|
Head, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Manipal College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal - 576 104, Karnataka
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
|How to cite this article:|
Rao M. Pharmacogenomics in palliative medicine. Indian J Palliat Care 2019;25:169-71
Pain relief is a basic human right., Progress in the domain of pain management, particularly in that of cancer, is quite slow and remains as one of the feared aspects of the disease. On an average, one out of three patients is not receiving pain medications appropriate to his/her pain intensity. Poor success rate of the existing pain and adjuvant therapies necessitates the need for pharmacogenomic testing in palliative care for better patient outcomes., Newer pharmacogenomic insights in the past two decades have revolutionized the management of many diseases and have paved the way for the induction of precision medicine in the clinical management of diseases. Pharmacogenomics involves the usage of pharmacogenomic testing to guide precision medicine with the ultimate goal of improving the drug efficacy and patient safety. Pharmacogenomic testing could stratify patients into various categories, such as likely responders, likely nonresponders, or likely to experience adverse drug reactions (ADRs) to a drug therapy. Pharmacogenomics has evolved as a potential tool to improve the patient care in pain management. Pain management medications are associated with a significant interindividual variability in the analgesic response. One of the prime reasons for this analgesic response variability is due to single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in gene that are involved in the drug metabolism and transport. Some of the genes that have gained a significant clinical interest for pharmacogenomic testing in the pain management of palliative care are cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6), cytochrome P450 2C9 (CYP2C9), ATP binding cassette subfamily B member 1 (ABCB1), cyclooxygenase-1 (PTGS1), cyclooxygenase-2 (PTGS2), opioid receptor μ (OPRM1), opioid receptor κ (OPRK1), opioid receptor δ (OPRD1), and catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT).
CYP2D6 enzyme accounts for <5% of all the CYPs expressed in the human body but is responsible for the metabolism for about 20% of all drugs, which includes many drugs employed in pain management. The CYP2D6 is a highly polymorphic gene with around 109 allelic variants and around 507 SNPs. Significant interethnic differences in allele distribution have been observed globally. Allelic combinations segregate the human populations into four groups of CYP2D6 phenotypes as poor, intermediate, extensive, and ultrarapid metabolizers. Poor metabolizers are mainly found in Europe, intermediate metabolizers in Asian, and ultrarapid metabolizers in North African population. A lot of medications within the opioid, antidepressant, antipsychotic, and antiemetic categories employed in palliative care settings are substrates for CYP2D6., CYP2D6 enzymes are responsible for the metabolism of opioids such as codeine, tramadol, and oxycodone to more potent opioid metabolites. As most of the opioid drugs exhibit narrow therapeutic index, precise dosage regimen design is mandatory for maintaining the delicate balance between therapeutic efficacy and toxicity. CYP2D6 genotyping becomes a highly relevant decisive dose-determining factor in this scenario. About 85% of antidepressants (amitriptyline, nortriptyline, citalopram, clomipramine, imipramine, desipramine, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, paroxetine, and venlafaxine) are major substrates of CYP2D6 enzyme, and 40% of antipsychotics (fluphenazine, haloperidol, aripiprazole, quetiapine, risperidone, and chlorpromazine) are substrates of CYP2D6 enzymes. Less than 20% of the patients are considered to be effective responders of antipsychotics. Poor metabolizers of CYP2D6 substrates are more susceptible to develop ADRs than extensive metabolizers, which warrant the need for dosage reductions in these drugs. As ADR to antidepressants mostly occurs during the initial phase of drug treatment, dosage adjustments should be done during the beginning of treatment itself.,
The CYP2C9 gene with over 50 variants is also highly polymorphic. Many nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) such as diclofenac, ibuprofen, celecoxib, and naproxen are metabolized by the cytochrome CYP2C9. CYP2C9 polymorphisms are found to be accountable for NSAID toxicity. Poor metabolizers have reduced CYP2C9 activity compared to wild type, resulting in reduced NSAID clearance, thereby increasing the risk of ADRs, most notably gastrointestinal bleeding.
Another potential target for pharmacogenomic testing in pain management is the ABCB1 gene that encodes for the efflux transporter P-glycoprotein. A lowered function of the P-glycoprotein transporter permits higher amounts of drug transportation across the blood–brain barrier. Opioids such as fentanyl, morphine, and methadone are P-glycoprotein substrates. Variants of the ABCB1 gene were associated with a higher frequency of ADRs to oxycodone and fentanyl intake., Considerable interest has also been gained on studying the influence of various allelic variants (due to SNPs) of genes such as PTGS1, PTGS2, OPRM1, OPRK1, OPRD1, and COMT in altering the pharmacodynamic responses to pain management drugs.
International consortia such as Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium, Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group guidelines, and Canadian Pharmacogenomics Network for Drug Safety guidelines have developed pharmacogenomic-based guidelines for the routine clinical use of opioids, NSAIDs, antidepressants, and antipsychotics.,,, The Food and Drug Administration has listed drugs that need to specify pharmacogenomic information in the drug labeling. Pharmacogenomic information can appear in different sections of the labeling depending on the actions that need to be addressed. Other regulatory agencies can also come up with such drug list that could reveal potential pharmacogenomic information so that specific actions could be taken based on the biomarker information.
Patients who received pharmacogenomic-guided care have reported a better understanding of pharmacogenomics and were more receptive toward the use of their pharmacogenomic information than traditional care patients but have expressed concerns over insurance coverage, employment discrimination, and skepticism about the usage of their pharmacogenomic results. These concerns should be duly addressed by all the stakeholders involved in pharmacogenomic testing. National regulations on pharmacogenomic testing with specific reporting and interpretation templates are required to avoid any ambiguity among patients and health-care professionals. With the advancement of genomic technologies, today genotyping results provide an exciting opportunity for the precise pain management in the palliative care within few hours requiring only short turnaround time for pharmacogenomic analysis with high sensitivity and specificity. Since Indian population has considerable interethnic genomic variations when compared with the Western population due to rich tapestry of cultures and ecologies, pharmacogenomics is an exhilarating field for researchers for establishing reference human genome and identifying novel mutations in the Indian population. Integration of pharmacogenomic and onco-pharmacist expertise into palliative care policy, research, and practice in clinical settings would greatly improve the provision of appropriate pain relief and consequent improvement of the quality of life to patients suffering from cancer and other terminal stage illnesses.
I am thankful to Dr. TMA Pai endowment chair in “Translational Research”.
| » References|| |
Lipman AG. Pain as a human right: The 2004 global day against pain. J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother 2005;19:85-100.
Brennan F. Palliative care as an international human right. J Pain Symptom Manage 2007;33:494-9.
Lemay K, Wilson KG, Buenger U, Jarvis V, Fitzgibbon E, Bhimji K, et al.
Fear of pain in patients with advanced cancer or in patients with chronic noncancer pain. Clin J Pain 2011;27:116-24.
Schork NJ. Personalized medicine: Time for one-person trials. Nature 2015;520:609-11.
Chwistek M. Recent advances in understanding and managing cancer pain. F1000Res 2017;6:945.
Kalow W. Human pharmacogenomics: The development of a science. Hum Genomics 2004;1:375-80.
Maliepaard M, Nofziger C, Papaluca M, Zineh I, Uyama Y, Prasad K, et al.
Pharmacogenetics in the evaluation of new drugs: A multiregional regulatory perspective. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2013;12:103-15.
Saba R, Kaye AD, Urman RD. Pharmacogenomics in pain management. Anesthesiol Clin 2017;35:295-304.
Peiró AM, Planelles B, Juhasz G, Bagdy G, Libert F, Eschalier A, et al.
Pharmacogenomics in pain treatment. Drug Metab Pers Ther 2016;31:131-42.
Zanger UM, Schwab M. Cytochrome P450 enzymes in drug metabolism: Regulation of gene expression, enzyme activities, and impact of genetic variation. Pharmacol Ther 2013;138:103-41.
Løvlie R, Daly AK, Matre GE, Molven A, Steen VM. Polymorphisms in CYP2D6 duplication-negative individuals with the ultrarapid metabolizer phenotype: A role for the CYP2D6 * 35 allele in ultrarapid metabolism? Pharmacogenetics 2001;11:45-55.
Gopisankar MG. CYP2D6 pharmacogenomics. EgyptJMedHum Genet2017;
Somogyi AA, Barratt DT, Coller JK. Pharmacogenetics of opioids. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2007;81:429-44.
Kirchheiner J, Brøsen K, Dahl ML, Gram LF, Kasper S, Roots I, et al.
CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 genotype-based dose recommendations for antidepressants: A first step towards subpopulation-specific dosages. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2001;104:173-92.
Cacabelos R, Hashimoto R, Takeda M. Pharmacogenomics of antipsychotics efficacy for schizophrenia. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2011;65:3-19.
Visser LE, van Schaik RH, van Vliet M, Trienekens PH, De Smet PA, Vulto AG, et al.
Allelic variants of cytochrome P450 2C9 modify the interaction between nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and coumarin anticoagulants. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2005;77:479-85.
Van Booven D, Marsh S, McLeod H, Carrillo MW, Sangkuhl K, Klein TE, et al.
Cytochrome P450 2C9-CYP2C9. Pharmacogenet Genomics 2010;20:277-81.
Pilotto A, Seripa D, Franceschi M, Scarcelli C, Colaizzo D, Grandone E, et al.
Genetic susceptibility to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-related gastroduodenal bleeding: Role of cytochrome P450 2C9 polymorphisms. Gastroenterology 2007;133:465-71.
Park HJ, Shinn HK, Ryu SH, Lee HS, Park CS, Kang JH. Genetic polymorphisms in the ABCB1 gene and the effects of fentanyl in Koreans. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2007;81:539-46.
Zwisler ST, Enggaard TP, Noehr-Jensen L, Mikkelsen S, Verstuyft C, Becquemont L, et al.
The antinociceptive effect and adverse drug reactions of oxycodone in human experimental pain in relation to genetic variations in the OPRM1 and ABCB1 genes. Fundam Clin Pharmacol 2010;24:517-24.
Hicks JK, Swen JJ, Thorn CF, Sangkuhl K, Kharasch ED, Ellingrod VL, et al.
Clinical pharmacogenetics implementation consortium guideline for CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 genotypes and dosing of tricyclic antidepressants. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2013;93:402-8.
Crews KR, Gaedigk A, Dunnenberger HM, Klein TE, Shen DD, Callaghan JT, et al.
Clinical pharmacogenetics implementation consortium (CPIC) guidelines for codeine therapy in the context of cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) genotype. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2012;91:321-6.
Swen JJ, Nijenhuis M, van Rhenen M, de Boer-Veger NJ, Buunk AM, Houwink EJ, et al.
Pharmacogenetic information in clinical guidelines: The European perspective. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2018;103:795-801.
Ross CJ, Visscher H, Sistonen J, Brunham LR, Pussegoda K, Loo TT, et al.
The Canadian pharmacogenomics network for drug safety: A model for safety pharmacology. Thyroid 2010;20:681-7.
Lee YM, McKillip RP, Borden BA, Klammer CE, Ratain MJ, O'Donnell PH. Assessment of patient perceptions of genomic testing to inform pharmacogenomic implementation. Pharmacogenet Genomics 2017;27:179-89.
Caudle KE, Dunnenberger HM, Freimuth RR, Peterson JF, Burlison JD, Whirl-Carrillo M, et al.
Standardizing terms for clinical pharmacogenetic test results: Consensus terms from the clinical pharmacogenetics implementation consortium (CPIC). Genet Med 2017;19:215-23.
Majumder PP, Basu A. A genomic view of the peopling and population structure of India. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2014;7:a008540.