Indian Journal of Palliative Care
Open access journal 
  Print this page Email this page   Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Users online: 1058  
     Home | About | Feedback | Login 
  Current Issue Back Issues Editorial Board Authors and Reviewers How to Subscribe Advertise with us Contact Us Analgesic Prescription  
  Navigate Here 
 »   Next article
 »   Previous article
 »   Table of Contents

 Resource Links
 »   Similar in PUBMED
 »  Search Pubmed for
 »  Search in Google Scholar for
 »Related articles
 »   Citation Manager
 »   Access Statistics
 »   Reader Comments
 »   Email Alert *
 »   Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded39    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


Year : 2019  |  Volume : 25  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 127--134

A reflection on the experience with conducting a clinical audit aimed at optimizing pain assessment in cancer patients in Sri Lanka

1 National Centre for Primary Care and Allergy Research, University of Sri Jayewardenepura, Nugegoda, Sri Lanka
2 School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff Wales, United Kingdom

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Gunasekara Vidana Mestrige Chamath Fernando
185, Vijaya Kumaratunga Mawatha, Colombo 000500
Sri Lanka
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/IJPC.IJPC_110_18

Rights and Permissions

Context: One of the principle obstacles identified in suboptimal management of pain in worldwide cancer patients is inadequate assessment of pain which in turn leads to poor management. In Sri Lanka, this is heralded by the lack of medical or nursing professionals qualified in Palliative Medicine/Care to date in Sri Lanka. Aim: The aims of this clinical audit were to raise awareness and optimize the assessment of pain among resident patients of a tertiary care cancer hospital by oncology doctors. Methods: A simple “pain and associated symptom chart” was designed for the doctors of the tertiary care cancer institution to document pain experienced by resident cancer patients in terms of intensity, both upon admission and on daily clerking. The expected standards were 100% documentation for each, regardless of the presence of pain on a visual analog scale (0–10). Documentation of the site and character of pain were expected to be 80% each. Results: Despite conducting three audit cycles with staff training and clarifications in between, the pain assessment practices did not be improve significantly (P > 0.05). In the third/ultimate audit cycle, it was noted that 23.5% of the charts were marked as “0” pain intensity upon admission and have been neglected thereafter. Conclusions: Pain assessment practices of the tertiary care oncology unit concerned was suboptimal. Therefore, it is of utmost importance to explore obstacles and incorporate pain assessment as a mandatory routine practice in clinical oncology units.


Print this article     Email this article

Online since 1st October '05
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow