Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Abstract
Abstracts
Addendum
Brief Communication
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Conference Abstract
Conference Editorial
Conference Proceedings
Current Issue
Editorial
Editorial Commentary
Erratum
General Medicine Original Article
General Medicine, Case Report
General Medicine, Review Article
IAPCONKochi 2019 Conference Proceedings
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Narrative Review
Original Article
Palliative Medicine Commentary
Palliative Medicine, Letter to Editor
Palliative Medicine, Letter to the Editor
Palliative Medicine, Original Article
Palliative Medicine, Review Article
Personal Reflection
Perspective
Perspectives
Position Paper
Position Statement
Practitioner Section
Report
REPUBLICATION: Special Article (Guidelines)
Retraction
Review Article
Reviewers 2023
Short Communication
Short Report
Special Editorial
Special Review
Systematic Review
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Abstract
Abstracts
Addendum
Brief Communication
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Conference Abstract
Conference Editorial
Conference Proceedings
Current Issue
Editorial
Editorial Commentary
Erratum
General Medicine Original Article
General Medicine, Case Report
General Medicine, Review Article
IAPCONKochi 2019 Conference Proceedings
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Narrative Review
Original Article
Palliative Medicine Commentary
Palliative Medicine, Letter to Editor
Palliative Medicine, Letter to the Editor
Palliative Medicine, Original Article
Palliative Medicine, Review Article
Personal Reflection
Perspective
Perspectives
Position Paper
Position Statement
Practitioner Section
Report
REPUBLICATION: Special Article (Guidelines)
Retraction
Review Article
Reviewers 2023
Short Communication
Short Report
Special Editorial
Special Review
Systematic Review
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Abstract
Abstracts
Addendum
Brief Communication
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Conference Abstract
Conference Editorial
Conference Proceedings
Current Issue
Editorial
Editorial Commentary
Erratum
General Medicine Original Article
General Medicine, Case Report
General Medicine, Review Article
IAPCONKochi 2019 Conference Proceedings
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Narrative Review
Original Article
Palliative Medicine Commentary
Palliative Medicine, Letter to Editor
Palliative Medicine, Letter to the Editor
Palliative Medicine, Original Article
Palliative Medicine, Review Article
Personal Reflection
Perspective
Perspectives
Position Paper
Position Statement
Practitioner Section
Report
REPUBLICATION: Special Article (Guidelines)
Retraction
Review Article
Reviewers 2023
Short Communication
Short Report
Special Editorial
Special Review
Systematic Review
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
24 (
4
); 526-528
doi:
10.4103/IJPC.IJPC_97_18

Effectiveness of the MELD/Na Score and the Child–Pugh Score for the Identification of Palliative Care Needs in Patients with Cirrhosis of the Liver

Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital de Santarem, Santarem, Portugal
Address for correspondence: Dr. Juan Carlos Perdomo Puentes, Jose Afonso Str, 2-2D, 2615-123 Alverca, Portugal. E-mail: juampuentes@gmail.com
Licence

This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

Objective:

Identification of palliative care needs in patients with liver cirrhosis using the MELD/Na score and the Child–Pugh score.

Materials and Methods:

A retrospective study of hospitalized patients with hepatic cirrhosis between January 2015 and December 2016 using the Child–Pugh score and the MELD/Na score in January 2018.

Results:

Recognizing end-of-life patients (the past 12 months of life) is a challenge for health professionals, especially in diseases with poorly defined criteria, such as cirrhosis of the liver. The verification of rapid functional decline and health indicators can be verified using already defined scales such as the Child–Pugh score and the MELD/Na score. Patients were classified according to the Child–Pugh score in Class A (17%), Class B (48.9%), and Class C (34%). The corresponding survival rate was as follows: class A (87.5%), Class B (30.4%), and Class C (31.25%). The MELD/Na score intervals were >9 (2.15%), score 10–19 (46.8%), score 20–29 (27.7%), score 30–40 (19.1%), and score >40 (4.3%). Nearly 51.1% had a MELD/Na score >20 and 48.9% <20. The study revealed that 59.6% of patients died before 12 months. They were end-of-life patients who needed palliative care to reduce the impact of the disease.

Conclusions:

The Child–Pugh score and the MELD/Na score represent a viable and easy-to-use tool to identify patients in need of palliative care, among those with liver cirrhosis. Early identification, timely evaluation, and effective treatment of physical, spiritual, family, and social problems improve the quality of life of people with incurable diseases and their families.

Keywords

Child–Pugh score
cirrhosis of the liver
identification of palliative care needs
MELD/Na score

INTRODUCTION

People are “approaching the end of life” when they are likely to die within the next 12 months. Patients with chronic liver disease have a life-limiting illness that causes multiple distressing symptoms and negatively affects quality of life. This population traditionally does not have an instrument for the identification of palliative care needs the “end of life,” the MELD/Na score, and the Child–Pugh score may be useful in its identification.[123]

Patients with cirrhosis of the liver should be treated with specific treatments for the control of symptoms at the end of their life course because of the strong impact of the disease on the patient and the family. To properly care for these patients, it is necessary to identify and organize an interdisciplinary plan of professionals in palliative care, with the intention of reducing the impact of the disease on patients.[45]

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study of hospitalized patients with hepatic cirrhosis between January 2015 and December 2016 using the Child–Pugh score and the MELD/Na score in January 2018.

The MELD/Na score is a scoring system for accessing the severity of chronic liver disease using values as serum bilirubin, serum creatinine, and the international normalized ratio for prothrombin time and sodium, to predict survival [Table 1].

Table 1 Interpretation MELD/Na score

The Child–Pugh score is used to access the prognosis of chronic liver disease, mainly cirrhosis. The score employs five clinical measures of liver disease: total bilirubin, serum albumin, prothrombin time, ascites, and hepatic encephalopathy [Table 2].[67]

Table 2 Interpretation Child-Pugh score

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

During this period, 6493 patients were hospitalized and 47 with liver cirrhosis were included in this study [Table 3].

Table 3 Patient status at the end of the study

The median age was 64.3 years; 95.7% were male. The median hospitalization time was 10.7 days. The overall mortality rate was 68.1%.

Patients were classified according to the Child–Pugh score in Class A (17%), Class B (48.9%), and Class C (34%). The corresponding survival rate was as follows: class A (87.5%), Class B (30.4%), and Class C (31.25%).

The 1-year mortality rate was as follows: class A (12.5%), Class B (65.2%), and Class C (68.75%). The mortality rate after the 1st year was as follows: class A (0%), Class B (4.3%), and Class C (0%). Palliative care needs were identified in Classes B and C [Table 4].

Table 4 Child-Pugh score of study

The MELD/Na score intervals were >9 (2.15%), score 10–19 (46.8%), score 20–29 (27.7%), score 30–40 (19.1%), and score >40 (4.3%). Nearly 51.1% had a MELD/Na score >20 and 48.9% <20 [Table 5].

Table 5 MELD/Na score of study

In January 2018, 31.9% were alive. About 44.7% had died in <3 months, 10.6% between 3 and 6 months, and 4.3% after 6 months.

The study revealed that 59.6% of patients died before 12 months. They were end-of-life patients who needed palliative care to reduce the impact of the disease.

According to the Child–Pugh score, in <1 year, the mortality rate of patients in Class B was 65.2% and 68.7% in Class C, and according to the MELD/Na score, patients with a score >20 had 51.1% mortality.

Given these percentages, both classes of patients had criteria to be identified as end-of-life patients requiring special care.

Patients had a decrease in quality of life, clinical, psychological, social, and family changes. Therefore, therapeutic adjustment was necessary to control the worsening of the following symptoms: edema, ascites, fever, fatigue, tiredness, drowsiness, confusion, loss of appetite, pain, dyspnea, and increased bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

According to the MELD/Na score, in a 3-month period after hospitalization, a number between 19.6% and 71.3% of patients had a mortality likelihood of 51.1%. These numbers of patients were in need of palliative care. The confirmed mortality rate was 44.7%, during these first 3 months.

According to the Child–Pugh score, our Classes B and C patients have a mortality of 65.2% and 68.75% at 1 year, respectively, needing palliative care.

The Child–Pugh score and the MELD/Na score represent a viable and easy-to-use tool to identify patients in need of palliative care, among those with liver cirrhosis.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

  1. , , . Assessment of prognosis of cirrhosis. Semin Liver Dis. 2008;28:110-22.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , . Assessment of the prognosis of cirrhosis: Child-Pugh versus MELD. J Hepatol. 2005;42(Suppl (1)):S100-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , . Cirrhosis in Adults: Etiologies, Clinical Manifestations, and Diagnosis. . UpToDate. Available from: https://www.uptodate.com/contents/cirrhosis-in-adults-etiologies-clinical-manifestations-and-diagnosis
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , . Important predictor of mortality in patients with end-stage liver disease. Clin Mol Hepatol. 2013;19:105-15.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , , , . Downgrading MELD improves the outcomes after liver transplantation in patients with acute-on-chronic hepatitis B liver failure. PLoS One. 2012;7:e30322.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , . Integration of palliative care in end-stage liver disease and liver transplantation. J Palliat Med. 2014;17:1271-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , , , . Model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) and allocation of donor livers. Gastroenterology. 2003;124:91-6.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections