|LETTER TO EDITOR
|Year : 2015 | Volume
| Issue : 3 | Page : 358-359
Searching for the right evidence: India's contribution to the cochrane pain, palliative and supportive care group
Hemanshu Prabhakar, Indu Kapoor, Charu Mahajan
Department of Neuroanaesthesiology, All Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
|Date of Web Publication||9-Sep-2015|
Department of Neuroanaesthesiology, All Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
|How to cite this article:|
Prabhakar H, Kapoor I, Mahajan C. Searching for the right evidence: India's contribution to the cochrane pain, palliative and supportive care group. Indian J Palliat Care 2015;21:358-9
|How to cite this URL:|
Prabhakar H, Kapoor I, Mahajan C. Searching for the right evidence: India's contribution to the cochrane pain, palliative and supportive care group. Indian J Palliat Care [serial online] 2015 [cited 2020 Sep 22];21:358-9. Available from: http://www.jpalliativecare.com/text.asp?2015/21/3/358/164897
The Cochrane Collaboration (CC) is spread over 120 countries and is in existence since 1992. The Cochrane Pain, Palliative, and Supportive (PaPaS) Group is one of the 53 Review Groups of the CC. The group publishes reviews of interventions for acute pain arising accidentally or through deliberate injury, chronic pain (lasting 3 months or longer), headache, and migraine, palliative care for those with life-limiting disease or illness and supportive care of patients, and significant others living with serious illness.
We wanted to identify the nationality of review authors in the PaPaS group and highlight the contribution of India in the published work. We collected relevant information from the website of the PaPaS group (www.papas.cochrane.org)*. The retrieved data was entered in to the Excel sheet and analyzed. Data are presented as number (%). A total of 148 review authors were identified for 190 published reviews. The authorship was mainly from the UK [n = 77 (52%)]. This was followed by authorship from the US [n = 13 (9%)] and Australia [n = 10 (7%)] [Figure 1] and [Table 1]. India contributed to only 1% authorship. It is evident that most authorship in the PaPaS group is from the UK. There is a need to spread awareness and information regarding the PapaS group in India. There is also a need to encourage authors to contribute to the CC by searching for the right evidence.