Indian Journal of Palliative Care
Open access journal 
  Print this page Email this page   Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Users online: 995  
     Home | About | Feedback | Login 
  Current Issue Back Issues Editorial Board Authors and Reviewers How to Subscribe Advertise with us Contact Us Analgesic Prescription  
  Navigate Here 
 Search
 
  
 Resource Links
  »  Similar in PUBMED
 »  Search Pubmed for
 »  Search in Google Scholar for
 »Related articles
  »  Article in PDF (662 KB)
  »  Citation Manager
  »  Access Statistics
  »  Reader Comments
  »  Email Alert *
  »  Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this Article
 »  Abstract
 » Background
 »  Materials and me...
 » Results
 » Conclusions
 »  References
 »  Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed3588    
    Printed80    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded252    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

 


 
Table of Contents 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2015  |  Volume : 21  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 35-38

Breaking bad news in cancer patients


Department of Internal Medicine, General Hospital of Komotini, Komotini, Greece

Date of Web Publication28-Jan-2015

Correspondence Address:
Apostolos Konstantis
Department of Internal Medicine, General Hospital of Komotini, Komotini
Greece
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0973-1075.150172

Rights and Permissions

 » Abstract 

Objective: In a regional hospital, many patients are newly diagnosed with cancer. Breaking the bad news in these patients and their relatives is a tough task. Many doctors are not experienced in talking to patients about death or death-related diseases. In recent years, there have been great efforts to change the current situation. The aim of this study was to investigate the experience and education of medical personnel in breaking bad news in a secondary hospital.
Materials and Methods: 59 doctors from General Hospital of Komotini, Greece were included in the study. All the doctors were in clinical specialties that treated cancer patients. A brief questionnaire was developed based on current guidelines such as Baile/SPIKES framework and the ABCDE mnemonic.
Results: Residents are involved in delivering bad news less frequently than specialists. Only 21 doctors (35.59%) had specific training on breaking bad news. 20 doctors (33.90%) were aware of the available techniques and protocols on breaking bad news. 47 doctors (79.66%) had a consistent plan for breaking bad news. 57 (96.61%) delivered bad news in a quiet place, 53 (89.83%) ensured no interruptions and enough time, 53 (89.83%) used simple words and 54 (91.53%) checked for understanding and did not rush through the news. 46 doctors (77.97%) allowed relatives to determine patient's knowledge about the disease.
Conclusions: There were low rates of specific training in breaking bad news. However, the selected location, the physician's speech and their plan were according to current guidelines.


Keywords: Breaking bad news, Cancer, Communication skills, Greece, Oncology, Truth telling


How to cite this article:
Konstantis A, Exiara T. Breaking bad news in cancer patients . Indian J Palliat Care 2015;21:35-8

How to cite this URL:
Konstantis A, Exiara T. Breaking bad news in cancer patients . Indian J Palliat Care [serial online] 2015 [cited 2019 Nov 22];21:35-8. Available from: http://www.jpalliativecare.com/text.asp?2015/21/1/35/150172



 » Background Top


Giving bad news to patients delicately is not an optional requirement for doctors but an essential part of professional practice. [1] In regional hospitals, many patients are newly diagnosed with cancer. Informing these patients and their relatives of bad news is a tough and challenging task. Most doctors do not have previous experience in talking to patients about death or death-related diseases and are required almost daily to give unwelcomed news without being prepared properly for such instances. [2] It is unforgivable if it is done without tact, understanding or compassion. If it is done well, patients may feel somewhat less hopeless and walk away with hope. [3] Bad news drastically and negatively alters the patients' view of their future. [4]

Delivering bad news is a stressful moment for physicians and patients too. [4],[5] Patients' satisfaction and perceptions of receiving bad news has been investigated. There is evidence that good communication of health care providers can improve patients' compliance with treatment and emotional adjustment. [6],[7],[8]

Unfortunately, communication skills are not an essential part of medical studies in many countries. This fact has a great impact on the way doctors approach patient when bad news delivered. During the last few years, there have been great efforts from universities and other institutions to change the current situation. There are many courses, forums and available printed materials that can help doctors improve their abilities and their knowledge in this challenging area. [9],[10] Besides that, there are structured guidelines for breaking bad news. Baile/SPIKES framework guidelines by Regnard and Kindren and the ABCDE mnemonic are some useful tools that can help doctors to improve their ability to deliver bad news. [11],[12],[13],[14]

The aim of this study was to investigate the experience and education of medical personnel in delivering bad news to cancer patients and the observance of some basic rules mentioned in the latest guidelines. In addition, this study proposes solutions to improving the everyday practice in a regional hospital.


 » Materials and methods Top


59 doctors from The General Hospital of Komotini in north Greece (26 specialists and 33 residents only of clinical specialties) were included in the study from October until December 2010. These doctors are involved in delivering bad news in everyday practice and often treat patients with cancer. Doctors of laboratory specialties (radiologists, microbiologists and pathologists) that are not directly delivering bad news were excluded from the study to avoid bias. Doctors who did not answer all the items of the questionnaire were further excluded (6 specialists and 4 residents).

Based on a literature review, an anonymous questionnaire developed. The questionnaire consisted of 20 items that measure education and some basic rules mentioned in the latest guidelines on breaking bad news. [11],[12],[13],[14] In addition, two demographic questions (sex and grade) were included. Yes/No responses were required for all questions, except six. Training, time, space characteristics and doctors' knowledge of current guidelines were registered. The final item of the questionnaire was an open comment on possible solutions to the current situation. Minitab 15.1.1 program was used for statistical analysis.


 » Results Top


26 specialists and 33 residents answered all items of the questionnaire. Residents delivered bad news less frequently than specialists did. 27 residents (81.82%) delivered bad news less than five times a month and 17 specialists (65.38%) five to ten times a month [Figure 1]. 42 doctors (64.41%) had not had specific training in breaking bad news. 21 doctors had specific training during undergraduate or postgraduate studies and through discussions and interviews with more experienced colleagues [Figure 2]. 47 doctors (79.66%) had a consistent plan for breaking bad news and 45 doctors (76.27%) answered that they do not deliver bad news the same way to all patients. 57 doctors (96.61%) choose a quiet place and 53 (89.83%) allocate ample time without any interruptions. Only 23 doctors sit close to patients (38.98%) and 34 of the doctors (57.63%) allow physical contact with them. 53 doctors (89.83%) use simple words, ensure patient understanding and do not rush through the news. In oncology cases, 51 doctors (86.44%) choose patients' relatives as first recipients of bad news. 46 doctors (77.97%) allow relatives to determine whether patients are informed fully about the disease. 33 doctors (55.93%) answered that they do not try to convince patients' relatives that the patient needs to know everything about the disease. 21 doctors (35.59%) answered that the diagnosis is the most difficult part in the discussion with oncology patients and their relatives. 26 doctors (44.07%) found that the most difficult task is to discuss the prognosis, 3 doctors (5.08%) about remission and 9 (15.25%) discussing the end of active treatment and start of palliative care [Figure 3]. 39 doctors (66.10%) had not heard about techniques and guidelines on breaking bad news and 36 (61.02%) had not tried to find out information about it. Finally, 57 doctors (96.61%) considered that training in breaking bad news is essential for their clinical practice.
Figure 1: Frequency

Click here to view
Figure 2: Specific education

Click here to view
Figure 3: The difficult part of discussion

Click here to view


In the comments section on possible solutions, doctors proposed role model groups, special courses and further training on current guidelines.


 » Conclusions Top


The goal of this investigation was to examine the experience of medical personnel in breaking bad news in a regional Greek hospital.

Similar to other published reports, a significant majority of doctors had not received specific training in breaking bad news. Residents have higher rates of undergraduate training because of promising efforts by many universities in order to change the current situation. [9],[15],[16],[17]

Most doctors have a consistent plan, do not treat all patients the same way and focus on patients' perceptions and preferences. Although doctors are not aware of the latest guidelines and techniques, in most of the cases they select a quiet place and allocate enough time, similar to the findings in other reports. [6] There are low rates of doctors who sit next to patients and allow physical contact with them. According to the SPIKES protocol and other guidelines, this behavior can have a negative effect in the establishment of a good doctor-patient relationship. [11] The majority of doctors use simple words and they check for understanding in similar rates to that described in other reports. These attitudes can lead to higher rates of satisfaction among the patients. [6]

This investigation indicates that in cancer patients, doctors very often prefer to share information with relatives and not directly with the patient. Probably as a result of past theories about a patient's best interest. [18] Furthermore, it can indicate doctors lack of confidence on their role as bearers of bad news or inability to respond to a patient's reactions and emotions. [19],[20]

In our study, the majority of the doctors felt uncomfortable discussing diagnosis or prognosis and have less difficulty discussing about the end of treatment and remission of cancer. In a regional hospital, there are many newly diagnosed patients with cancer and the discussion of the diagnosis and prognosis are the most difficult issues that concern a physician prior to patient's referral to an oncology department.

All participants identified the difficulties in breaking bad news and considered specific training as essential.

A few limitations of this study must be noted. First of all, most questions required a "Yes" or "No" answer, which restricts the collected data to these two categories. Secondly, the sample was relatively small and obtained from only one regional hospital, so there was statistical bias and no comparison between different hospitals. The timescale was short and had no possible modifications as this audit performed as an assessment for a postgraduate course. As a result, it was difficult to expand the sample with data from other regional hospitals. Aside from that, in a regional hospital without an oncology department, patients with cancer are not the majority. Many doctors probably answered many items of the questionnaire with poor experience. Finally, because of the self-report method, there may be a respondent reporting bias.

There are many training courses with proven effectiveness in breaking bad news, organized in hospitals worldwide, as mentioned in various research papers. [21] To improve the current situation, medical schools should introduce obligatory lectures and workshops with the aim to improve future doctors' communication skills.

In our hospital, there are low rates of specific training in communication skills and awareness of protocols and techniques on breaking bad news. However, the selected location, the physician's speech and plan for breaking bad news are followed according to current guidelines. In oncology patients, doctors prefer to deliver bad news to patients' relatives who determine patient knowledge. Possible solutions to improve the current situation include the:

• Development and publication of regional guidelines

• Organization of local groups responsible for training in the use of the guidelines and their implementation in practice

• Training in communication skills during undergraduate studies in medical schools

• Regular meetings in hospitals and interviews with specialized professionals in breaking bad news

• Hospital-based training workshops.

 
 » References Top

1.
Breaking Bad News. Regional Guidelines. Department of Health, Social Services and Public Safety, Castle Buildings, Belfast; 2003.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Orlander JD, Fincke BG, Hermanns D, Johnson GA. Medical residents' first clearly remembered experiences of giving bad news. J Gen Intern Med 2002;17:825-31.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Buckman R. Talking to patients about cancer. BMJ 1996;313:699-700.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Buckman R. Breaking bad news: Why is it still so difficult. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1984;288:1597-9.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Ptacek JT, Eberhardt TL. Breaking bad news: A review of the literature. JAMA 1996;276:496-502.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Ptacek JT, Ptacek JJ. Patients' perceptions of receiving bad news about cancer. J Clin Oncol 2001;19:4160-4.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Cameron C. Patient compliance: Recognition of factors involved and suggestions for promoting compliance with therapeutic regimens. J Adv Nurs 1996;24:244-50.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Roberts CS, Cox CE, Reintgen DS, Baile WF, Gibertini M. Influence of physician communication on newly diagnosed breast patients' psychologic adjustment and decision-making. Cancer 1994;74 Suppl 1:336-41.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Knox JD, Thomson GM. Breaking bad news: Medical undergraduate communication skills teaching and learning. Med Educ 1989;23:258-61.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Buckman R, Kason Y. How to break bad news: A practical guide for healthcare professionals. London: Macmillan; 1993.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Baile WF, Buckman R, Lenzi R, Glober G, Beale EA, Kudelka AP. SPIKES -a six step protocol for delivering bad news: Application to the patient with cancer. Oncologist 2000;5:302-11.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Regnard C, Kindren M. What about breaking bad news? In: Supportive and Palliative Care. An Introduction. 1 st ed. Oxford: Radcliffe Medical Press; 2002. p. 110-3.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Rabow MW, McPhee SJ. Beyond breaking bad news: How to help patients who suffer. West J Med 1999;171:260-3.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Vandekieft GK. Breaking bad news. Am Fam Physician 2001;64:1975-8.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Farrell M. Breaking Bad news. In: Shaw T, Sanders K, editors. Foundation of Nursing Studies Dissemination Series. Vol. 1. No. 2. 2002.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Baile WF, Lenzi R, Parker PA, Buckman R, Cohen L. Oncologists' attitudes toward and practices in giving bad news: An exploratory study. J Clin Oncol 2002;20:2189-96.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Dias L, Chabner BA, Lynch TJ Jr, Penson RT. Breaking bad news: A patient's perspective. Oncologist 2003;8:587-96.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Holland JC. Now we tell-but how well? J Clin Oncol 1989;7:557-9.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Mosconi P, Meyerowitz BE, Liberati MC, Liberati A. Disclosure of breast cancer diagnosis: Patient and physician reports. GIVIO (Interdisciplinary Group for Cancer Care Evaluation, Italy). Ann Oncol 1991;2:273-80.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Thomsen OO, Wulff HR, Martin A, Singer PA. What do gastroenterologists in Europe tell cancer patients? Lancet 1993;341:473-6.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Abel J, Dennison S, Senior-Smith G, Dolley T, Lovett J, Cassidy S. Breaking bad news-Development of a hospital-based training workshop. Lancet Oncol 2001;2:380-4.  Back to cited text no. 21
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
Online since 1st October '05
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow