Indian Journal of Palliative Care
Open access journal 
  Print this page Email this page   Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Users online: 58  
     Home | About | Feedback | Login 
  Current Issue Back Issues Editorial Board Authors and Reviewers How to Subscribe Advertise with us Contact Us Analgesic Prescription  
  Navigate Here 
 Search
 
  
 Resource Links
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Article in PDF (348 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this Article
   References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1780    
    Printed44    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded103    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

 


 
Table of Contents 
PERSONAL REFLECTION
Year : 2014  |  Volume : 20  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 65

Distress screening using distress thermometer


1 Primary Care Unit, KMT Center, Bangkok, Thailand
2 Visiting Professor, Hainan Medical University, Hainan, China

Date of Web Publication21-Jan-2014

Correspondence Address:
Sora Yasri
Primary Care Unit, KMT Center, Bangkok, Thailand

Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0973-1075.125574

Rights and Permissions



How to cite this article:
Yasri S, Wiwanitkit V. Distress screening using distress thermometer. Indian J Palliat Care 2014;20:65

How to cite this URL:
Yasri S, Wiwanitkit V. Distress screening using distress thermometer. Indian J Palliat Care [serial online] 2014 [cited 2020 Jul 14];20:65. Available from: http://www.jpalliativecare.com/text.asp?2014/20/1/65/125574


Sir,

The report on distress screening using distress thermometer is very interesting. [1] Lewis et al., [1] concluded for "Positive correlation between distress score and pain score and occurrence of physical symptoms." The concern is on distress thermometer. Chambers et al., [2] reported that this tool was acceptable in case that "a cut-off of ≥4 may be optimal soon after diagnosis, and for longer-term assessments, ≥3 was supported." The adjustment of the tool for each setting is needed. Martínez et al., [3] noted that "the diagnostic accuracy of the DT could be improved with minor proposed modifications to the DT and the inclusion of nonemotional ultra short measures." Second, the tool has to be modified in case that it was aiming at pediatric patients screening. [4]

 
  References Top

1.Lewis S, Salins N, Kadam A, Rao R. Distress screening using distress thermometer in head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy and evaluation of causal factors predicting occurrence of distress. Indian J Palliat Care 2013;19:88-92.  Back to cited text no. 1
  Medknow Journal  
2.Chambers SK, Zajdlewicz L, Youlden DR, Holland JC, Dunn J. The validity of the distress thermometer in prostate cancer populations. Psychooncology 2013.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Martínez P, Galdón MJ, Andreu Y, Ibáñez E. The Distress Thermometer in Spanish cancer patients: Convergent validity and diagnostic accuracy. Support Care Cancer 2013;21:3095-102.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Haverman L, van Oers HA, Limperg PF, Houtzager BA, Huisman J, Darlington AS, et al. Development and validation of the distress thermometer for parents of a chronically ill child. J Pediatr 2013;163:1140-6.  Back to cited text no. 4
    




 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
Online since 1st October '05
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow