Indian Journal of Palliative Care
Open access journal 
  Print this page Email this page   Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Users online: 437  
     Home | About | Feedback | Login 
  Current Issue Back Issues Editorial Board Authors and Reviewers How to Subscribe Advertise with us Contact Us Analgesic Prescription  
  Navigate Here 
 Search
 
  
 Resource Links
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Article in PDF (371 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this Article
   References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2321    
    Printed126    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded140    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

 


 
Table of Contents 
EDITORIAL
Year : 2012  |  Volume : 18  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 147-148

Need of evidence-based practice in chronic pain


Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi-110029, India

Date of Web Publication8-Jan-2013

Correspondence Address:
Sushma Bhatnagar
Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi-110029
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0973-1075.105682

Rights and Permissions



How to cite this article:
Bhatnagar S. Need of evidence-based practice in chronic pain. Indian J Palliat Care 2012;18:147-8

How to cite this URL:
Bhatnagar S. Need of evidence-based practice in chronic pain. Indian J Palliat Care [serial online] 2012 [cited 2020 Sep 24];18:147-8. Available from: http://www.jpalliativecare.com/text.asp?2012/18/3/147/105682


"Medicine is the art of probability":Osler

The modern day practice of medicine is getting simpler with the availability of newer advanced diagnostic modalities along with the availability of medicines and many therapeutic options. At the same time, it becomes more challenging for the clinician to keep themselves updated about the advancements and using them in appropriate manner. Thus, the paradigm shift is from opinion-based medicine to evidence-based medicine (EBM). EBM is defined as a conscientious, explicit, and judicious use of current best evidence in making decisions about care of individual patients. [1] The evidence-based practice of medicine requires the physician to use his clinical expertise gained by him along with the background of specific contextual application of knowledge, in concert with the best available external evidence reported in the literature. [2] In other words, the steps for evidence-based practice require the following: [3]

  • Recognition of the patient's problem and construction of a structured clinical question
  • Thorough search of the medical literature
  • Critical analysis of the searched evidence, and finally
  • Integrating the searched evidence in light of clinical scenario to reach a clinical decision in best interest of the patient care.
To make available such evidence-based clinical practice, "practice guidelines" are developed and proposed by various societies in fields of medicine to assist clinicians in deciphering an appropriate decision for clinical care for specific clinical circumstances. Clinical practice guidelines are systemically developed statements by a group of experts based on thorough evaluation of the evidence from the published literature on a particular topic. These statements are expected to be objective, unbiased, up-to-date, evidence based, rather than authority based and free from conflict of interest. [4] These must incorporate validity, reliability, reproducibility, clinical applicability, flexibility, clarity, development through a multidisciplinary process, scheduled reviews, and documentation. [4] At times, there are limitations of these guidelines in pain medicine including a paucity of the reported literature, lack of updates, and conflicts in preparation of systematic reviews and guidelines. [5] Also, concerns have been raised regarding non-applicability across populations. [4] The specialty of pain medicine is still emerging and faces some peculiar problem for evidence-based practice due to limited available evidence and variance in the definition and the practice of pain medicine. [6],[7],[8],[9],[10]

A hierarchy of strength of evidence for treatment decisions provided by Guyatt and Drummond is as follows: [11]

  • N-of-1 Randomized controlled trial (RCT)
  • Systematic reviews of randomized trials
  • Single randomized trial
  • Systematic review of observational studies addressing patient-important outcomes
  • Single observational study addressing patient-important outcomes
  • Physiological studies (studies of blood pressure, cardiac output, exercise capacity, bone density, and so forth)
  • Unsystematic clinical observations.
The N-of-1 RCT has the highest strength of evidence for treatment decisions but is limited in the pain medicine. [11] The next best evidence is based on systematic review and meta-analysis of the published well-conducted RCTs. EBM practice requires the amalgamation of guidelines, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, RCTs, observational studies, and diagnostic studies. The evid ence in pain practice is quite variable and many aspects are still lacking. In this issue, the authors have reviewed the present evidence related to pain management practice. They have reviewed the available evidence regarding various aspects of pain management.

I urge the pain physician to conduct randomized clinical trials for various aspects of pain management including assessment tools and the pain management modalities, so that a good evidence be created for practice of pain management.

 
  References Top

1.Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence based medicine: What it is and what it isn't. BMJ 1996;312:71-2.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]    
2.Manchikanti L. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management, part I: Introduction and general considerations. Pain Physician 2008;11:161-86.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]    
3.Hatala R, Guyatt G. Evaluating the teaching of evidence-based medicine. JAMA 2002;288:1110-2.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]    
4.Manchikanti L, Singh V, Helm S 2 nd , Schultz DM, Datta S, Hirsch JA, et al. An introduction to an evidence-based approach to interventional techniques in the management of chronic spinal pain. Pain Physician 2009;12:E1-33.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Manchikanti L, Boswell MV, Singh V, Benyamin RM, Fellows B, Abdi S, et al. Comprehensive evidence-based guidelines for interventional techniques in the management of chronic spinal pain. Pain Physician 2009;12:699-802.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]    
6.Manchikanti L, Helm S, Singh V, Benyamin RM, Datta S, Hayek SM, et al. An algorithmic approach for clinical management of chronic spinal pain. Pain Physician 2009;12:E225-64.  Back to cited text no. 6
[PUBMED]    
7.Boswell MV, Trescot AM, Datta S, Schultz DM, Hansen HC, Abdi S, et al. Interventional techniques: Evidence-based practice guidelines in the management of chronic spinal pain. Pain Physician 2007;10:7-111.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]    
8.Manchikanti L. Health care reform in the United States: Radical surgery needed now more than ever. Pain Physician 2008;11:13-42.  Back to cited text no. 8
[PUBMED]    
9.Manchikanti L, Singh V, Pampati V, Smith HS, Hirsch JA. Analysis of growth of interventional techniques in managing chronic pain in the Medicare population: A 10-year evaluation from 1997 to 2006. Pain Physician 2009;12:9-34.  Back to cited text no. 9
[PUBMED]    
10.Sniderman AD, Furberg CD. Why guideline-making requires reform. JAMA 2009;301:429-31.  Back to cited text no. 10
[PUBMED]    
11.Drummond MF, Richardson WS, O'Brien B, Levine M, Heyland DK. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Users' Guides to the Medical Literature XIII. How to use an article on economic analysis of clinical practice. A. Are the results of the study valid? JAMA 1997;277:1552-7.  Back to cited text no. 11
    




 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
Online since 1st October '05
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow