Indian Journal of Palliative Care
Open access journal 
  Print this page Email this page   Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Users online: 74  
     Home | About | Feedback | Login 
  Current Issue Back Issues Editorial Board Authors and Reviewers How to Subscribe Advertise with us Contact Us Analgesic Prescription  
  Navigate Here 
 »   Next article
 »   Previous article
 »   Table of Contents

 Resource Links
 »   Similar in PUBMED
 »  Search Pubmed for
 »  Search in Google Scholar for
 »Related articles
 »   Citation Manager
 »   Access Statistics
 »   Reader Comments
 »   Email Alert *
 »   Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed788    
    Printed83    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded38    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

 

 ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2012  |  Volume : 18  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 34--39

Effectiveness of two high-dose-rate intraluminal brachytherapy schedules for symptom palliation in carcinoma esophagus: A tertiary care center experience


1 Department of Radiotherapy, PGIMER, Chandigarh, Punjab, India
2 Department of Gastroentrology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, Punjab, India

Correspondence Address:
Rakesh Kapoor
Department of Radiotherapy, PGIMER, Chandigarh, Punjab
India
Login to access the Email id


DOI: 10.4103/0973-1075.97347

Get Permissions

Aim: The aim was to analyze different radiation schedules with high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy in patients with unresectable carcinoma esophagus in terms of dysphagia-free survival (DyFS), local control (LC), disease-free survival (DFS), and complications. Materials and Methods: Eighty-six patients were studied under three different radiation schedules: Schedule A - radiation 35 Gy/15# followed by HDR brachytherapy 6 Gy each in two sessions; schedule B - chemoradiation 35 Gy/15# with weekly injection cisplatin 30 mg/m 2 infusion and 5-fluorouracil 325 mg/m 2 bolus followed by HDR brachytherapy 6 Gy each in two sessions; and schedule C - same chemoradiation dose followed by HDR brachytherapy three sessions of 4.68 Gy each. The median follow-up was 12.1 months. Results: Treatment compliance was good. There were no significant differences in the incidence of acute toxicities across the three schedules. No grade III toxicities were noted. At 1 month, 27 patients had dysphagia improvement, which was not different across the three schedules. At 6 months, schedule C showed a trend toward better symptom control of dysphagia (dysphagia free=55%). The 2-year DyFS reached 49.5% in schedule C. Two-year LC rates were approximating 89% in both chemoradiation schedules versus 67.6% in schedule A. The 2-year DFS was also high in chemoradiation schedules. Major complications like ulceration and tracheoesophageal fistulas were more often seen with schedule B with a higher dose per fraction of the brachytherapy schedule. Conclusion: In unresectable carcinoma esophagus, radiation-only schedules are associated with lower LC and DFS rates. Concurrent chemoradiation followed by a brachytherapy boost is feasible in suitable patients with a good Karnofsky performance score and are associated with higher DyFS, LC, and DFS with acceptable toxicities. Still there is a need for the standardization of HDR brachytherapy schedules with chemoradiation protocols.






[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*


        
Print this article     Email this article

Online since 1st October '05
Published by Medknow