| ORIGINAL ARTICLE
|Year : 2011 | Volume
| Issue : 1 | Page : 42--46
Clinical audit on documentation of anticipatory "Not for Resuscitation" orders in a tertiary australian teaching hospital
Naveen Sulakshan Salins1, Wendy Jansen2
1 Consultant, Department of Integrative Oncology, HCG Enterprise Ltd-Bangalore Institute of Oncology, Bangalore, India
2 Mary Potter Nursing Research Fellow, Discipline of Nursing. The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
Aim: The purpose of this clinical audit was to determine how accurately documentation of anticipatory Not for Resuscitation (NFR) orders takes place in a major metropolitan teaching hospital of Australia.
Materials and Methods: Retrospective hospital-based study. Independent case reviewers using a questionnaire designed to study NFR documentation reviewed documentation of NFR in 88 case records.
Results: Prognosis was documented in only 40% of cases and palliative care was offered to two-third of patients with documented NFR. There was no documentation of the cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) process or outcomes of CPR in most of the cases. Only in less than 50% of cases studied there was documented evidence to suggest that the reason for NFR documentation was consistent with patient's choices.
Conclusion: Good discussion, unambiguous documentation and clinical supervision of NFR order ensure dignified and quality care to the dying.
Naveen Sulakshan Salins
Consultant, Department of Integrative Oncology, HCG Enterprise Ltd-Bangalore Institute of Oncology, Bangalore
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*