| ORIGINAL ARTICLE
|Year : 2011 | Volume
| Issue : 1 | Page : 33--41
The attitudes of Indian palliative-care nurses and physicians to pain control and palliative sedation
Joris Gielen1, Harmala Gupta2, Ambika Rajvanshi2, Sushma Bhatnagar3, Seema Mishra3, Arvind K Chaturvedi4, Stef Van den Branden1, Bert Broeckaert1
1 Interdisciplinary Centre for the Study of Religion and World View (Catholic University Leuven), Sint-Michielsstraat 4 - Bus 3101, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
2 CanSupport, Kanak Durga Basti Vikas Kendra, Sector 12, R.K. Puram, India
3 Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, India
4 Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, Sector 5 Rohini, New Delhi, India
Aim: We wanted to assess Indian palliative-care nurses and physicians' attitudes toward pain control and palliative sedation.
Materials and Methods: From May to September 2008, we interviewed 14 physicians and 13 nurses working in different palliative-care programs in New Delhi, using a semi-structured questionnaire, and following grounded-theory methodology (Glaser and Strauss).
Results: The interviewees did not consider administration of painkillers in large doses an ethical problem, provided the pain killers are properly titrated. Mild palliative sedation was considered acceptable. The interviewees disagreed whether palliative sedation can also be deep and continuous. Arguments mentioned against deep continuous palliative sedation were the conviction that it may cause unacceptable side effects, and impedes basic daily activities and social contacts. A few interviewees said that palliative sedation may hasten death.
Conclusion: Due to fears and doubts regarding deep continuous palliative sedation, it may sometimes be too easily discarded as a treatment option for refractory symptoms.
Interdisciplinary Centre for the Study of Religion and World View (Catholic University Leuven), Sint-Michielsstraat 4 - Bus 3101, 3000 Leuven
Source of Support: Flemish Interuniversity Council and the University Development Cooperation (Flanders, Belgium), Conflict of Interest: None
[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*