Indian Journal of Palliative Care
Open access journal 
  Print this page Email this page   Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Users online: 848  
     Home | About | Feedback | Login 
  Current Issue Back Issues Editorial Board Authors and Reviewers How to Subscribe Advertise with us Contact Us Analgesic Prescription  
  Navigate Here 
 Search
 
  » Next article
  » Previous article 
  » Table of Contents
  
 Resource Links
  »  Similar in PUBMED
 »  Search Pubmed for
 »  Search in Google Scholar for
 »Related articles
  »  Article in PDF (448 KB)
  »  Citation Manager
  »  Access Statistics
  »  Reader Comments
  »  Email Alert *
  »  Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this Article
 »  Abstract
 »  Introduction
 »  Methods
 »  Analysis and Results
 »  Discussion
 »  Conclusion
 »  Acknowledgements
 »  References
 »  Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed10956    
    Printed272    
    Emailed9    
    PDF Downloaded421    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 8    

Recommend this journal

 


 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2008  |  Volume : 14  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 71-74

Attitudes towards euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide among Pakistani and Indian doctors: A survey


1 Deputy Medical Director, St Clare Hospice, Hastingwood, Essex, United Kingdom
2 Assistant Professor in Medicine, Muhammad Medical College, Mirpurkhas, Pakistan
3 Head of Palliative Care Programme, Bangalore Baptist Hospital, Bangalore, India

Correspondence Address:
Syed Qamar Abbas
Deputy Medical Director, St Clare Hospice, Hastingwood, Essex CM17 9JX
United Kingdom
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0973-1075.45448

Rights and Permissions

 » Abstract 

Aim: This study attempts to assess the attitude of Pakistani and Indian doctors to euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide.
Methods: We used a questionnaire survey that included one case history of a patient with cancer and another of one suffering from motor neurone disease (MND).
Results: Fifty-two of 100 doctors from Pakistan returned the completed questionnaires. Eight of the 52 (15.3%) doctors agreed with the concept of euthanasia being an acceptable option for the patient with MND. Six of the 52 (11.5%) supported a similar approach for the cancer patient. From India, 60/100 doctors returned the completed questionnaires. Sixteen of the 60 (26.6%) doctors supported euthanasia as an option for the patient with MND whereas 15 (25%) supported a similar option for the cancer patient.
Conclusion: We conclude that only a minority of the doctors support euthanasia. This group belongs to a younger age group. In Pakistan, they were more likely to be males. The religion of the doctors did not appear to be a determining factor.


Keywords: Doctors, euthanasia, India, Pakistan, perception, physician-assisted suicide


How to cite this article:
Abbas SQ, Abbas Z, Macaden S. Attitudes towards euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide among Pakistani and Indian doctors: A survey. Indian J Palliat Care 2008;14:71-4

How to cite this URL:
Abbas SQ, Abbas Z, Macaden S. Attitudes towards euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide among Pakistani and Indian doctors: A survey. Indian J Palliat Care [serial online] 2008 [cited 2018 Dec 17];14:71-4. Available from: http://www.jpalliativecare.com/text.asp?2008/14/2/71/45448



 » Introduction Top


In 2002, the Netherlands became the first country to legalise euthanasia. Following this, the rest of the world began to debate the attitudes toward euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide. There is a lot of data from the western world discussing healthcare professionals' or lay people's attitudes toward euthanasia. The Nursing Times in the United Kingdom reported the results of a poll of 2700 nurses that established that two out of three nurses think that euthanasia should be legalised. [1] In addition, 80% of the British public surveyed in a recent report support changes in existing laws that legalise the option of euthanasia for terminally ill patients. [2] However, a study from the United States of America, which surveyed 2333 oncology nurses, suggested that only 30% support assisted suicide and 23% approve of euthanasia. [3] A similar study in Japan showed that 25.7% resident doctors surveyed supported the concept of euthanasia whereas 48% of first-year medical students supported the idea. [4]

Despite working in resource-poor settings, doctors from developing countries have provided good clinical and ethical perspectives to healthcare issues. This study aims to look at the perceptions of doctors from Pakistan and India about euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide.


 » Methods Top


A questionnaire was developed discussing two case studies. These case studies described the circumstances of two patients, one with motor neurone disease (MND) and the other with widespread malignancy.

The cases were:

  1. An 80-year-old man is suffering from MND (or some other form of severe degenerative neurological disease). Day by day, he is deteriorating to the extent that his swallowing is impaired, his breathing is difficulty, he cannot stand or sit and it is getting hard to talk. He requests you to help him die.
  2. An 80-year-old woman suffering from cancer has widespread disease. Her pain from multiple skin secondaries and bone secondaries is getting harder to control. She is very scared of dying in pain. She requests you to help her die as the pain is now unbearable.


It was distributed, by hand, to a convenience sample of doctors from all specialities, who were trained in Pakistan and India, with most of them still working in these countries. The distribution and collection of questionnaires was carried out over a period of 6 months.


 » Analysis and Results Top


From Pakistan, 52/100 (30 males, 22 females) doctors returned the questionnaires. They belonged to Muslim (47) or Hindu (5) religions. The discipline of the doctors is described in [Table 1]. The mean age of the doctors was 42.8 years (26-66), with a mean experience of 15 years (2-40). Eight of the 52 (15.3%) doctors agreed that euthanasia would be an acceptable course of action for the patient with MND whereas 6/52 (11.5%) agreed that euthanasia should be allowed for patients with malignancies. Seven Muslim, one Hindu, six male and two female doctors supported euthanasia as an appropriate intervention. Their mean age was 41.1 years (29-57) and their mean experience was 13.3 years (3-30).

From India, 60/100 (28 males, 32 females) doctors returned the questionnaires. They belonged to Christian (23), Hindu (26) or Muslim (10) religions. The mean age of the doctors was 35.4 (23-58), with a mean experience 10.2 years (0-34). Sixteen of the 60 (26.6%) doctors agreed that euthanasia could be an option for the patient with MND, whereas 15 (25%) agreed with the idea of euthanasia for the patient with cancer. Four Christian, 16 Hindu, eight male and eight female doctors supported the concept of euthanasia. Their mean age was 31.25 years (23-52) and their mean experience was 6.75 years (0-18).

The motivations that supported their decisions are described in detail in [Table 2].


 » Discussion Top


Until recently, medical ethics in palliative care had been focussed mainly on withdrawing treatment rather than euthanasia. There is a large body of evidence from the developed countries looking into perceptions surrounding euthanasia. One study found that the factors associated with the wish to hasten death were concerns around physical symptoms, psychological suffering, perceiving themselves as a burden to others, higher levels of demoralisation, less confidence in symptom support, fewer social supports, less satisfaction with experiences and fewer religious beliefs. [5] Another study identified that most nurses found it difficult to deal with persistent requests from patients for assistance with dying. [6]

While the western world, especially the United Kingdom, has pioneered palliative care provision, the developing world still struggles to achieve these standards. A questionnaire survey from Pakistan revealed that only 54% of the doctors had some experience of Palliative care and most doctors had no training on end-of-life issues. [7] However, with globalisation of medicine and patient awareness, doctors in developing countries come across situations where such issues are raised with increasing frequency. This study was undertaken to look into the perceptions of doctors while making decisions regarding hastening death for patients with incurable diseases.

It is a small study looking into the perceptions of doctors in the subcontinent. India has a population of 1.027 billion and has a literacy rate of 65%. The main religion is Hinduism, but Islam and Christianity are also sizeable minorities. India maintains a secular entity by law . Pakistan has a population of 137.5 million and has a literacy rate of 38%, with more than 90% of its inhabitants following Islam, which is also the national religion . Islam does not allow euthanasia under any circumstances whereas there are differing Hindu perspectives on euthanasia. [8],[9]

Many Hindus would not support a doctor's decision to assist a patient's request for euthanasia because of the ideological belief that this causes an unnatural separation of the body and soul, resulting in damage to the "karma" of both the perpetrator (doctor) and the recipient (patient).

Another ideological Hindu approach is that the provision of euthanasia violates the core Hindu tenet of ahimsa (doing no harm). However, others would argue that assistance in ending a painful life is performing a good deed and hence fulfilling their moral obligation .

Our survey shows that the majority of the doctors did not agree with the idea of euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide. However, among the doctors who supported the idea of hastening death, lesser experience and a younger age group were noted to be prominent variables. No clear association could be made with regard to the doctor's religion and approval for assistance with euthanasia. In Pakistan, doctors approving of euthanasia were more likely to be men. Previous studies have shown that the risk factors for patients requesting euthanasia were concerns with physical symptoms, psychological suffering, perceiving themselves to be more of a burden to others, higher levels of demoralisation, less confidence in symptom support, fewer social supports, less satisfaction with experiences and fewer religious beliefs. [5] It can be postulated that in these two South Asian countries, family and social supports are more prevalent as is the influence of religious beliefs in the practise of medicine. Doctors were less likely to feel strongly about physical suffering as the abundant psychological and emotional support would moderate the total pain experienced. It is interesting that doctors of both opinions have felt strongly that it was their moral obligation to make their particular opinion. It reflects strongly polarised beliefs expressed elsewhere in the world. Interestingly, both proponents and opponents of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide arrive at their respective convictions based on their respective moral stances. [10],[11] Doctors from Pakistan also sighted religious reasons as a strong reason for not hastening death, which appears in line with the country's strong Islamic tradition. However, an association between the doctor's faith and support for euthanasia could not be established, probably reflecting the study's small sample size.


 » Conclusion Top


This study was undertaken to look at doctors' perceptions regarding euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide. However, the relevance of the results is limited by the small sample size and other larger studies from these countries are required to confirm the trends observed here and explore other areas of relevance such as patients' perceptions and doctors' motivations for deciding in favor of or against euthanasia. With the current developments in the field of palliative medicine in developing countries, it is important to develop a culture where training of palliative care is provided along with an understanding of issues and ethics that influence important end-of-life decisions.


 » Acknowledgements Top


Part of this study "Attitudes toward euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide among Pakistani doctors" was presented as a poster at the 9 th European Congress of Palliative Care, Aachen, Germany 7-10 April 2005.

 
 » References Top

1.Hemmings P. Dying wishes: Should patients have the right to choose when and how they die? Nurs Times 2003;47:20-2.  Back to cited text no. 1    
2.Donnison D, Bryson C. Matters of life and death: Attitudes to euthanasia. In: Jowell R, Curtis J, Park A, Brook L, Thomson K, editors. British Society Attitudes: the 13th Report. Dartmouth Publishing, Aldershot: 1996.  Back to cited text no. 2    
3.Ferrel B, Virani R, Grant M, Coyne P, Uman G. Beyond the Supreme court decisions: Nursing perspectives on end-of-life care. Oncol Nurs Forum 2000;27:445-55.  Back to cited text no. 3    
4.Akabayashi A, Slingsby BT, Kai I, Nishimura T, Yamagishi A. The development of a brief and objective method for evaluating moral sensitivity and reasoning in medical students. BMC Med Ethics 2004;5:1-11.  Back to cited text no. 4    
5.Kelly B, Burnett P, Pelusi D, Badger S, Varghese F, Robertson M. Terminally ill cancer patients′ wish to hasten death. Palliat Med 2002;16:339-45.  Back to cited text no. 5  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
6.Schwarz JK. Responding to persistent requests for assistance in dying: A phenomenological enquiry. Int J Palliat Nurs 2004;10:225-35.  Back to cited text no. 6    
7.Abbas SQ, Muhammad SR, Mubeen SM, Abbas SZ. Awareness of palliative medicine among Pakistani doctors: A survey. J Pak Med Assoc 2004;54:195-9.  Back to cited text no. 7  [PUBMED]  
8.Islamic European Council for Fatwa and Research (ECFR). 11th Session. Stockholm, Sweden July 2003.  Back to cited text no. 8    
9.http://www.religionfacts.com/euthanasia/hinduism.htm. (last visited 29th January 2009)  Back to cited text no. 9    
10.Annets D. Comments from Voluntary Euthanasia Society, In: Views on end-of-life issues from around the world. Int J Palliat Nurs 2004;10:248-9.  Back to cited text no. 10    
11.Bisset M. Euthanasia is not an adequate response to suffering at the end of life, In: Views on end-of-life issues from around the world. Int J Palliat Nurs 2004;10:253-4.  Back to cited text no. 11    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]

This article has been cited by
1 Personality Factors and Attitudes Toward Euthanasia in Iran: Implications for End-of-Life Research and Practice
Naser Aghababaei,Jason Adam Wasserman,Javad Hatami
Death Studies. 2014; 38(2): 91
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia in Indian context: Sooner or later the need to ponder!
Khan, F. and Tadros, G.
Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine. 2013; 35(1): 101-105
[Pubmed]
3 Euthanasia: The perceptions of nurses in India
Poreddi, V. and Nagarajaiah and Konduru, R. and Math, S.B.
International Journal of Palliative Nursing. 2013; 19(4): 187-193
[Pubmed]
4 Knowledge and attitude regarding euthanasia among medical students in the public and private medical schools of Karachi
Hassan, W. and Ahmad, F. and Malik, A. and Ali, S.
Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association. 2013; 63(2): 295-299
[Pubmed]
5 Perception of Euthanasia in students of public medical University in Karachi
Usman, G. and Agha, S. and Hashmi, S.A.
Medical Forum Monthly. 2012; 23(7): 27-31
[Pubmed]
6 Euthanasia: Does the onus rest with the physicians
Patra, S. and Patro, B.
Indian Journal of Community Medicine. 2012; 37(1): 60-61
[Pubmed]
7 Euthanasia: Evolving role of the psychiatrists in India
Chavan, B.S. and Patra, S.
Indian Journal of Psychiatry. 2012; 54(2): 108-110
[Pubmed]
8 Attitudes toward euthanasia among doctors in a tertiary care hospital in South India: A cross sectional study
Kamath, S. and Bhate, P. and Mathew, G. and Sashidharan, S. and Daniel, A.
Indian Journal of Palliative Care. 2011; 17(3): 197-201
[Pubmed]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
Previous article Next article
Online since 1st October '05
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow